Pondicherry

Pondicherry

CC/11/2016

Chirag Jain - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sony Center Represented by its Authorized Signatory and 2 others - Opp.Party(s)

Party in Person

09 Jun 2016

ORDER

Final Order1
Final Order2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/11/2016
 
1. Chirag Jain
Room no 88,Boys Hotel, Block -A, Pondicherry Engineering college
pondicherry
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Sony Center Represented by its Authorized Signatory and 2 others
No.261 J.N Street,Puducherry-605001
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. A.ASOKAN PRESIDENT
  PVR.DHANALAKSHMI MEMBER
  V.V. Steephen MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

                                               BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PONDICHERRY

 

                                         C.C.No.11/2016

 

Dated this the 9th day of June 2016

 

(Date of Institution: 11.04.2016)

 

Chirag Jain

Room No. 88, Boys Hostel

Block-B, Pondicherry Engineering College

Puducherry – 605 014.

                                                                                                         ..…Complainant

Vs.

1. Sony Center rep. by its Authorised Signatory

     No.261, J.N. Street

     Puducherry – 1.

 

2. Sony Authorised Service Centre rep. by its

    Authorised Signatory             

    No.176, Lal Bahadur Shastri Street   

   Puducherry – 605 001.

 

3. Sony India Pvt Ltd., rep. by its

    Authorised Signatory

    A-31, Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate

    Mathura Road, New Delhi – 110 044.

                                                                                                   …...Opposite Parties                                                                

 

BEFORE:

 

          THIRU.A.ASOKAN, B.A., B.L.,

          PRESIDENT 

 

Tmt. PVR. DHANALAKSHMI, B.A., B.L.,

MEMBER

 

Thiru V.V. STEEPHEN, B.A., LL.B., 

           MEMBER

 

                            

FOR THE COMPLAINANT            :  Chirag Jain                  

 

FOR THE OPPOSITE PARTIES:

OP.1                       : Thiru S. Vimal,  Advocate

OP.2                       

OP.3                       : Ex Parte

                                                                             

 

 

 

 

O R  D  E  R

                    

          This is a complaint filed u/s.12 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for directing the opposite parties jointly and severally,

  1. To pay a sum of Rs.60,000/- with interest at 10% per annum from the date of purchase till realisation of the device;
  2. To pay a sum of Rs.75,000/- towards compensation for the loss and injury caused to the complainant because of the negligent and deficient services of the opposite parties;
  3. To pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- being the cost of this complaint.  

 

2. Notice to opposite parties were duly served. 

 

3. Today this complaint was called.  Complainant present.  Opposite Parties absent.  Counsel for second Opposite party absent.  Counsel for first opposite party present.  Complainant filed petition to withdraw the complaint stating that the parties have amicably settled the issue to the satisfaction of the complainant and prays to not press the claim.  In view of the endorsement, this complaint is hereby dismissed as not pressed.  No costs.

Dated this the 9th day of June 2016.

 

 

  1.  ASOKAN)

PRESIDENT

 

 

 

(PVR. DHANALAKSHMI)

MEMBER

 

 

 

 

 

(V.V. STEEPHEN)

MEMBER

  

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. A.ASOKAN]
PRESIDENT
 
[ PVR.DHANALAKSHMI]
MEMBER
 
[ V.V. Steephen]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.