Put up today.

Sh. Parveen Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and Sh. Nitin Kumar Garg, learned counsel for respondent   No. 1, are present.  None is present on behalf of respondent No. 2, although service of notice upon respondent No. 2 has already been held to be sufficient vide order dated 17.05.2022.

A Compromise Deed has been filed on behalf of the appellant and respondent No. 1.

Learned counsel for the appellant states that he is authorised to enter into compromise on behalf of the appellant – company and he has made the aforesaid endorsement on the back of Compromise Deed.

Learned counsel for the appellant and respondent No. 1 submit that they have settled their dispute through compromise, hence the appeal should be decided in terms of compromise. 

The Compromise Deed has been verified by learned counsel for the appellant and respondent No. 1.

Order

Accordingly, the appeal is decided in terms of the compromise, which shall form part of the order.

The amount deposited by the appellant with this Commission, be released in its favour.

Let the record be consigned.