Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/500/2013

Munnur Ravindar, s/o. Late M. Krishnaiah age 55 years, Occ: Legal Practitioner, R/o. H.No. 42-252, Sri Krishna Nilayam, New Gunj, Beside RTC New Bus- Stand, Wanaparthy Town. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Somisetty Venkateshwarulu, S/o. Venkata Subbaiah, Ganesh Real Estates (Regd.), Somisetty Real Estate - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.Munnur Ravindar

10 Mar 2014

ORDER

BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
AT HYDERABAD
 
First Appeal No. FA/500/2013
(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/05/2013 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/43/2012 of District Kurnool)
 
1. Munnur Ravindar, s/o. Late M. Krishnaiah age 55 years, Occ: Legal Practitioner, R/o. H.No. 42-252, Sri Krishna Nilayam, New Gunj, Beside RTC New Bus- Stand, Wanaparthy Town.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Somisetty Venkateshwarulu, S/o. Venkata Subbaiah, Ganesh Real Estates (Regd.), Somisetty Real Estate(Regd.) & Sri Sowbagya Real Estate (Regd.) Office No. 40-414,Upstairs, Eashwarnagar, Kurnool 518 004
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE Gopala Krishna Tamada PRESIDENT
 HON'ABLE MR. T.Ashok Kumar MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MR. S. BHUJANGA RAO MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

 

BEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION: AT HYDERABAD.

 

FA.No.500/2013 against CC.No.43/2012 District Consumer Forum, Kurnool.

 

 

Between:

Munnur Ravindar, S/o.late M.Krishnaiah,

Age : 55 years,

Occ: Legal Practitioner, R/o.H.No.42-252,

Sri Krishna Nilayam, New Gunj,

Beside RTC New Bus Stand, Wanaparthy Town.

…Appellant/Complainant.

And

Somisetty Venkateshwarulu,

S/o.late S.Venkata Subbaiah,

Ganesh Real Estates (Regd.)

Somisetty Real Estates (Regd) and

Sri Sowbagya Real Estates (Regd.)

Office No.40-414, Upstairs, Eashwarnagar,

Kurnool – 518 004.

…Respondent/Opposite Party.

 

Counsel for the Appellant            : None.  Party-in-person.

Counsel for the Respondent        : Notice held sufficient. 

 

 

QUORUM: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALAKRISHNA TAMADA, HON’BLE PRESIDENT,

SRI T.ASHOK KUMAR, HON’BLE MEMBER,

AND

SRI S.BHUJANGA RAO, HON’BLE MEMBER.

 

       MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH,

TWO THOUSAND FOURTEEN.

Oral Order (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Gopalakrishna Tamada, Hon’ble President)

*******     

The docket entries dated 11.10.2013, 13.11.2013, 09.12.2013, 28.01.2014 clearly establish that on a number of occasions, the appellant (party-in-person) was absent.  In those circumstances, as there was no option, we were constrained to list the matter under the caption of “dismissal”.  Today also, the learned counsel for the appellant is absent.  Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed. 

            

 

 

 

    (PRESIDENT)               (MEMBER)              (MEMBER)

                 

                                               Dt:10.03.2014.

Vvr.  

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE Gopala Krishna Tamada]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'ABLE MR. T.Ashok Kumar]
MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MR. S. BHUJANGA RAO]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.