Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsels for respondent Nos. 1 & 2 are present.  None is present for respondent No. 3.   

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the subject matter of the revision petition has since been amicably settled between the petitioner and respondent No. 1 in that the respondent No. 1 will pay, in all, a sum of Rs. 56,000/- as full and final settlement of the complaint in question and the petitioner will withdraw all the litigations under this revision petition against the respondents.  Accordingly, a note to this effect is filed by learned counsel for the petitioner signed by both the learned counsel for the petitioner and  learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 which is kept on record.  In this context, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 points out that a sum of Rs. 96,000/- has already been deposited by respondent No. 1 with the District Forum by way of a demand draft dated 15.12.2010 issued in the name of complainant/petitioner – Mr. Brij Ajit Singh and the same is still continuing in deposit with the District Forum.  In view of today’s settlement, since the amount of settlement is Rs. 56,000/- and the earlier demand draft is in the name of the complainant which is with the District Forum, the respondent No. 1 is directed to bring a fresh demand draft for Rs. 56,000/- in the name of the complainant/petitioner on the next date of hearing before the District Forum which is the date in the execution proceeding i.e. 03.02.2011 and hand over the same to the complainant/petitioner.  On the respondent No. 1 handing over the demand draft of Rs. 56,000/- in pursuance to today’s settlement to the petitioner/complainant, the District Forum is directed to release and return back the earlier demand draft of Rs. 96,000/- along with accrued interest thereon, if any, to respondent No. 1.  In view of today’s settlement and the request of the petitioner to withdraw the petition, subject to the settlement entered into between the parties, the present revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn, subject to these directions.   Dasti is allowed to both the parties, for further necessary action.

          At the instance of learned counsel for the petitioner it is hereby clarified that in view of the aforesaid settlement and the directions given today for compliance to the parties and the District Forum, no further action shall remain be taken in pursuance of the complaint of the complainant/petitioner, filed with the consumer fora, and, respondent No. 1 shall not claim any scrap pertaining to the equipment in question.