Kerala

Alappuzha

CC/217/2011

Jancy Xavier - Complainant(s)

Versus

SNDP Yogam Kollam-01 - Opp.Party(s)

31 Oct 2011

ORDER

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ALAPPUZHA
 
Complaint Case No. CC/217/2011
 
1. Jancy Xavier
W/o.Xavier Antony Vengassery Veedu,Nedumudy.P.O,Kuttanadu Taluk,Alappuzha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. SNDP Yogam Kollam-01
Rep.By its General Secretary
2. SNDP Branch No.363
Kakkazham,Neerkkunnam,TDMC.P.O,Ambalappuzha Taluk,Rep.By its Secretary
3. P.G.Babu,S/o.Gangadharan
President,SNDP Branch No.363,Neerkkunnam,Thayangari Veedu,Kopparakkadavu,Kakkazhom,Ambalappuzha Taluk
4. K.Bhaskaran
Secretary,SNDP Branch No.363,Neerkkunnam,Anavelil Veedu,Neerkkunnam,Ambalappuzha Taluk,Alappuzha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONORABLE K.Anirudhan PRESIDING MEMBER
 HONORABLE Smt;Shajitha Beevi Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

 

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ALAPPUZHA
Monday     the 31st   day of October , 2011
Filed on 23.06.2011
Present
1.      Sri. Jimmy Korah (President)
2.      Sri. K. Anirudhan (Member)
3.      Smt. N. Shajitha Beevi (Member)
 
in
C.C.No.217/2011
 
Between
 
           Complainant:-    
    Opposite Parties
 
Smt. Jancy Xavior,
W/o Xavior Antony,
Vegassery Veedu,
P.O, Nedumudi- 688508,
Kuttanadu Thaluk, Alappuzha (D)
1.      SNDP Yogam, Kollam-01, Represented by General Secretary.
2.      SNDP Branch No: 363, Kakkazham, Neerkunnam, TDMC. P.O, Ambalapuzha Taluk,  Represented by its secretary.
3.      Sri. P.G. Babu, S/o Gangakdharan,   President, SNDP Branch No. 363, Neerkunnam, Thayamkari Veedu, Kopparakadavu, Kakkazham- AmbalapuzhaTaluk, Alappuzha.
4.      Sri. K. Bhaskaran, ( Secretary , SNDP Branch No : 363 , Neerkunnam) Anavelil Veedu, Neerkunnam , Ambalapuzha Taluk, Alappuzha.
 
                                                                       
 
 
 
 
 
 
                  O R D E R
SMT. N.SHAJITHA BEEVI (MEMBER)
 
   
The complainant’s has  filed this complaint before the Forum on 23.06.2011 alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties. The brief facts of the allegations of the complainant are as follows:- The first opposite party is the General Secretary of the SNDP Yogam, Kollam. The 3rd   opposite party is the  President   of the Second  opposite party - SNDP Sakha Yogam No. 363, Kakkazhom, Neerkunnam and the  4th  opposite party  is the Secretary of the same. On the assurance of the 3rd and 4th opposite parties, the complainant had deposited a total sum of Rs. 104000/-on different dates. The opposite parties had  promised 24 % interest per month and issued pass book at the time of the deposit. The opposite parties paid interest till October,2006. Thereafter the opposite parties  failed to pay the interest or deposited amount till date, even though they  had requested to return the amount, they  filed this complaint seeking relief.
            2.   Notices were issued to the opposite parties, and they had not appeared before this Forum. Considering their absence, they were set exparte by this Forum.
            3. Considering the allegations of the complainant, this Forum has raised the following issues:-
                1)  Whether there is any deficiency  in service and negligence on the part   of   the   opposite parties                         in repayment of fixed deposit to the complainants ?
           
     2) Whether the complainant  are  entitled to get compensation and costs from the opposite             parties?
          
          4. Issues 1 and 2:- Complainant had filed proof affidavit in the support of  her  case and produced documents in evidence – Ext.A1 & A2 marked. Ext. A1 is the Power of attorney and  A2 are the  original  Pass book  issued by the opposite parties to the complainant  at the time of depositing the amount  The book shows that an amount of Rs.104000/- is the  outstanding amount to be released. .
         5. On a careful study of the entire matter of this case, it can be seen that as per the assurance given by the opposite parties, the complainant had deposited the amount in the Trust administered by the opposite parties. The opposite parties had paid interest to the complainant for a certain period, for the said deposited amount. Since the opposite parties had defaulted payment of interest, the complainant  requested the opposite parties to return the amount with interest. But the opposite parties have not shown any effort to return the same. This will amounts to cheating. The entire actions on the part of the opposite parties shows the deficiency in service and negligence. There is no justification on the part of the opposite parties in retaining the amount which is payable to the complainant. The complainant is entitled to get back the deposited amounts with interest fully. Since there is deficiency in service and negligence on the part of the opposite parties by way  of denial of repayment to the depositors, the complainant is  entitled to get compensation and costs from the opposite parties and that the opposite parties are jointly and severely liable for that.  Considering, the whole aspects of this case, we are fully convinced that the allegations put forward by the complainant is highly genuine. So the complaint is to be allowed. All the issues are found in favour of the complainants.
            In the result, for the ends of justice, we hereby direct the opposite parties 2 to 4 the amount of Rs.104000 /- (Rupees One lakh four thousand  only) with 18% interest from October  2006  till the date of the repayment of the  entire amount and pay a compensation of Rs. 5000/- (Rupees five  thousand only) to the complainant  for her mental agony, pain, sufferings, inconvenience and loss due to the grossest deficiency in service and culpable negligence on the part of the opposite parties and further pay a sum of Rs. 1000/- (Rupees One  thousand only) as cost of this proceedings. We further direct the opposite parties to pay the above said amounts to the complainant  within the 30 days from the date of receipt of this order.
            Pronounced in open Forum on this the   31st   day of October , 2011.
 
 Sd/-Smt. N. Shajitha Beevi
 Sd/-Sri. Jimmy Korah
                                                                                          Sd/-Sri. K. Anirudhan
                                                                                                                                               
Appendix:-
 
Evidence of the complainant:- 
Ext. A1          -     Power of Attorney
Ext. A2          -     Pass book of     complainant
 
 Evidence of the opposite parties:- Nil 
           
 
// True Copy //
 
 
                                                                                                By Order 
 
   
                                                                                             Senior Superintendent
To
            Complainant/Opposite Parties/S.F.
 
Typed by:- sh/-     
 
Compared by-
 
 
 
 
[HONORABLE K.Anirudhan]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HONORABLE Smt;Shajitha Beevi]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.