Kerala

Alappuzha

CC/355/2011

Prakasan - Complainant(s)

Versus

SNDP Sakha Yogam Br.No.363 - Opp.Party(s)

31 Mar 2012

ORDER

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ALAPPUZHA
 
Complaint Case No. CC/355/2011
 
1. Prakasan
S/o.P.K.Thankappan,Nadakkalparambu Vishnu Nivas,Near kidangamparambu Temple,Mullackal Village,Alappuzha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. SNDP Sakha Yogam Br.No.363
Kakkazham , Neerkkunnam,Rep.by its Secretary
2. Sri.K.Bhaskaran, Secretary
S.N.D.P Sakha Yogam Branch No. 363,Kakkazham, Neerkkunnam,S/o.Kesavan,Anavelil House,Neerkkunnam,Alappuzha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE JIMMY KORAH PRESIDENT
 HONORABLE K.Anirudhan Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

 

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ALAPPUZHA

Saturday the 31st  day of   March, 2012

Filed on  05.11.2011

Present

  1. Sri. Jimmy Korah (President)
  2. Sri. K. Anirudhan (Member)
  3. Smt. Shajitha Beevi (Member)

in

C.C.No.355/2011

between

Complainant:-                                                                                     Opposite Parties:-

 

Sri.Prakasan                                                                       1.         SNDP Sakha Yogam No.363

Nadakkalparambu Vishnu Nivas                                                     Kakkazhom, Neerkkunnam

Near Kidangamparambu Temple                                                    Alappuzha, Represented by

Mullackal Village,  Alappuzha                                                         its Secretary

(By Adv. Laly Joseph)                                                       

                                                                                          2.         Sri.K.Bhaskaran, Secretary

                                                                                                      SNDP Sakha Yogam No.363

                                                                                                      Kakkazhom, S/o Kesavan

                                                                        Anavelil House

                                                                        Neerkkunnam, Alappuzha

                                                              

O R D E R

SMT. N. SHAJITHA BEEVI (MEMBER)

          

Sri. Prakasan has filed this complaint before the Forum on 05.11.2011 alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties.  The brief facts of the allegations of the complainant are as follows:- The 1st and 2nd   opposite parties are the SNDP Sakha Yogam, represented by its Secretary, SNDP Sakha Yogam No. 363, Kakkazhom.   The entire operation of the Sakha Yogam is being carried out by one Sri. Bhaskaran,  the Secretary.  The specific assurance of the opposite parties he had deposited a  sum of Rs.1,30,000/- before the Sakha Yogam on different dates and opposite parties issued pass book to the complainant.  They had  paid  interest till 26.9.2006 and thereafter  the opposite parties failed to pay the interest or deposited amount till date, even though he had requested to return the amount.    Since there was no positive steps to return the amount, he filed this complaint seeking relief. 

            2.   Notices were issued to the opposite parties. They had not appeared before this Forum.  Considering their absence, they were set exparte by this Forum.

           

 

3. Considering the allegations of the complainant, this Forum has  raised the following issues:-

                  1)   Whether there is any deficiency in service and negligence on the part of the opposite parties

       in   repayment of fixed deposit to the complainant?

           

      2)   Whether the complainant is entitled to get compensation and costs from the opposite parties?

          

            5.  Issues 1 and 2:- Complainant has filed proof affidavit in the support of his case and produced documents in evidence – Ext.A1 was marked.  Ext. A1 is  the original  Pass book  issued by the opposite parties to the complainant at the time of depositing the amount.   It shows that the deposited amount, interest paid etc.    

6. On a careful study of the entire matter of this case and verification of the documents,  it can be seen that as per the assurance given by the opposite parties, the complainant had deposited the amount in the Sakha Yogam administered by the opposite parties 1 and 2.  The pass book  issued by the opposite parties shows that opposite parties had paid some interest to the complainant for a certain period, for the said deposited amount.  Since the opposite parties had defaulted payment of interest, the complainant requested the opposite parties to return the amount with interest. But the opposite parties have not shown any  earnest effort to take proper steps to return the same. This will amounts to cheating. The entire actions on the part of the opposite parties shows the deficiency in service and negligence in repayment of deposited amount with interest to the complainant in time. There is no justification on the part of the opposite parties in retaining the amount with interest which is payable to the complainant.  The action of the opposite parties are highly illegal and arbitrary and without any bona fides.  The complainant is fully entitled to get back the deposited amounts with interest from the opposite parties. Since there is deficiency in service and negligence on the part of the opposite parties by way of purposeful denial of repayment of amounts to the complainant, he is entitled to get compensation and costs from the opposite parties and that the opposite parties are jointly and severely liable for that.  Considering, the whole aspects of this case and after verification of the documents,  we are fully convinced that the allegations put forward by the complainant against the opposite parties are highly genuine. So the complaint is to be allowed.   All the issues are found in favour of the complainant.

            In the result, for the ends of justice, we hereby direct the opposite parties to return the deposited  amount of Rs.1,30,000/- (Rupees one lakh and thirty thousand only) to the complainant along with 18% interest per annum from 26.09.2006  till the  date of  repayment of the entire amount  to the complainant  and pay a compensation of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) to the complainant for his mental agony, pain, sufferings, inconvenience and loss due to the grossest deficiency in service, culpable negligence and unfair trade practice  of the opposite parties by way of purposeful refusal to return back the deposited amounts and its interest in time to the complainant, and further pay a sum of Rs.2000/- (Rupees two thousand only) as cost of this proceedings.  We further direct the opposite parties to pay the above said amounts to the complainant within  30 days from the date of receipt of this order.

            Pronounced in open Forum on this the 31st  day of  March, 2012.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           Sd/- Smt. N. Shajitha Beevi

 

                                                                                                                                       Sd/- Sri. Jimmy Korah:

                                                                                                 

                                                                                                                                       Sd/- Sri.K. Anirudhan:

                                                                                     

Appendix:-

 

Evidence of the complainant:- 

 

Ext. A1              -         Original pass book

 

Evidence of the opposite parties:- Nil

 

  // True Copy //

 

                                                                                                                                                By Order

 

 

                                                                                                                                      Senior Superintendent

 

To

         Complainant/Opposite parties/S.F.

 

 

  Typed by:- pr/-

 

 Compared by:-

 

 

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE JIMMY KORAH]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONORABLE K.Anirudhan]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.