CC:No.1689/2016

Dated: 29.6.2017

Case called out for couple of times at 11.15 am and also at 12.15 pm, on both occasions complainant remained absent and no representation made on his behalf.  Perusing the order sheet, it reveals that, despite of many number of opportunities given to the complainant to file affidavit evidence, but the complainant remained absent and did not chose to file his evidence. In order to prove the case of the parties and in support of their pleadings, they have to file affidavit evidence. Merely on the basis of the pleadings, the case of the parties cannot be appreciated. Pleadings are not the substituted for evidence. The non filing of the affidavit evidence shows that, the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case. Under these circumstances, the complaint is dismissed for want of prosecution.