| Miscellaneous Application No. MA/114/2016 | | In | | First Appeal No. A/78/2016 |
| | | | 1. Branch Manager, LIC of India, Hailakandi Branch, represented by Assistant Secretary (Legal), LIC of India | | North East Cell, Guwahati, Dist.-Kamrup, Assam | | 2. Divisional Manager, LIC of India, Silchar Division, represented by Assistant Secretary (Legal), LIC of India | | N. E. Cell, Guwahati | | Kamrup | | Assam |
| ...........Appellant(s) | |
| Versus | | 1. Smti. Mita Rani Deb | | W/o Late Kanai Deb, R/o Vill-Paikan, P.O.-Paikan, P.S., Dist.-Hailakandi, Assam | | 2. Karan Deb | | S/o Late Kanai Deb, R/o Vill-Paikan, P.O.-Paikan, P.S.-Hailakandi, | | Hailakandi | | Assam | | 3. Kanak Deb | | S/o Late Kanai Deb, R/o Vill-Paikan, P.O.-Paikan, P.S.-Hailakandi, | | Hailakandi | | Assam | | 4. Smti. Soni Deb | | D/o Late Kanai Deb, R/o Vill-Paikan, P.O.-Paikan, P.S.-Hailakandi, | | Hailakandi | | Assam |
| ...........Respondent(s) |
|
|
| Final Order / Judgement | Heard Mr. A. Kundu, learned counsel, appearing for the applicant. Also heard Ms. J. Das, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent. This is an application for condoning the delay of 35 days in preferring the accompanying appeal. We have perused the statements made in the application. Also perused the objection filed by the respondent. The grounds for delay has been explained at paragraphs 2 to 10 of the application. We have found that sufficient causes have been shown for not preferring the appeal in time. Thus, considering the statements made in the application, particularly, statements made on oath at paragraphs 2 to 10 of the application, also for the ends of justice, delay in preferring the accompanying appeal is condoned. Misc Case is allowed and disposed of accordingly. | |
