Assam

StateCommission

MA/3/2017

Sahara India Pariwar, Represented by Branch Manager/Sector Manager, Golaghat Branch - Complainant(s)

Versus

Smti Juri Borah - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. S. K. Barkataki

01 Dec 2017

ORDER

BEFORE THE ASSAM STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
GUWAHATI
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/3/2017
In
First Appeal No. A/3/2017
 
1. Sahara India Pariwar, Represented by Branch Manager/Sector Manager, Golaghat Branch
Golaghat Branch/Sector, P.O., P.S.-Golaghat
Golaghat
Assam
2. Regional Officer, Sahara India Pariwar
Phulbagan, Dibrugarh, Pin-786001
Dibrugarh
Assam
3. Regional Office, Sahara India Pariwar
3rd Floor, Kusum Mansion, Rajgarh Road, Bhangagarh, Guwahati-781005
Kamrup
Assam
4. Command Office, Sahara India Commercial Corp. Ltd.
Sahara India Bhawan, 1 Kapurthela Complex, Lucknow-226024
Uttar Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Smti Juri Borah
W/o Late Dilip Borah R/o Ultajan Gaon, P.O.-Ultajan, P.S.-Golaghat, Pin-785702
Golaghat
Assam
2. National Insurance Co. Ltd.
Registered Office & Head Office at 3, Middleton Street Kolkata and Regional Office at G. S. Road, Bhangagarh, Guwahati
West Bengal
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE A. Hazarika PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Dilip Kr. Mahanta MEMBER
 HON'BLE MS. Renu Prava Mahanta MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:Mr. S. Das,Advocate, Proxy for Mr. S. K. Barkataki, Advocate for
For the Respondent: Ms. S. Khanikar,Advocate, for Ms. P. Baruah, Advocate
 Mr. R. Goswami, Advocate
Dated : 01 Dec 2017
Final Order / Judgement

 

                Heard Ms. S. Das, learned counsel, appearing for the applicant. Also heard Ms. S. Khanikar, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. R. Goswami, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 2.

                 This is an application for condoning the delay of 270 days in preferring the accompanying appeal. We have perused the statements made in the application. The grounds for delay has been explained at paragraphs 2 to 5 of the application. We have found that sufficient causes have been shown for not preferring the appeal in time. Thus, considering the statements made in the application, particularly, statements made on oath at paragraphs 2 to 5 of the application, also for the ends of justice, delay in preferring the accompanying appeal is condoned.

                    Misc Case is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE A. Hazarika]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Dilip Kr. Mahanta]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MS. Renu Prava Mahanta]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.