Assam

StateCommission

MA/105/2016

National Insurance Co. Ltd. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Smti Juri Borah - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. I. Barooah

01 Dec 2017

ORDER

BEFORE THE ASSAM STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
GUWAHATI
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/105/2016
In
First Appeal No. A/74/2016
 
1. National Insurance Co. Ltd.
Registered Office & Head Office at 3, Middleton Street Kolkata and Regional Office at G. S. Road, Bhangagarh, Guwahati, Dist.- Kamrup, Assam
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Smti Juri Borah
W/o Late Dilip Borah R/o Ultajan Gaon, P.O.-Ultajan, P.S., Dsist.-Golaghat, Assam
2. Branch Manager/Sector Manager of Golaghat Branch, Sahara India Pariwar
Golaghar Branch/Sector, P.O., P.S.-Golaghat
Golaghat
Assam
3. Regional Office, Sahara India Pariwar
Phool Bagan, Dibrugarh
Dibrugarh
Assam
4. Zonal Office, Sahara India Pariwar
IIIrd Floor, Kusum Mansion, Rajgarh Road, Bhangagarh, Guwahati-781005
Kamrup
Assam
5. Command Office, Sahara India Commercial
Sahara India Bhawan, 1, Kapporthala Complex, Lucknow-226024
Uttar Pradesh
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE A. Hazarika PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Dilip Kr. Mahanta MEMBER
 HON'BLE MS. Renu Prava Mahanta MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:Mr. R. Goswami,Advocate, Proxy for Mr. I. Barooah, Advocate for
For the Respondent: Ms. S. Khanikar, Advocate
 Ms. M. Das, Advocate
 Ms. M. Das, Advocate
 Ms. M. Das, Advocate
 Ms. M. Das, Advocate
Dated : 01 Dec 2017
Final Order / Judgement

                    Heard Mr. R. Goswami, learned counsel, appearing for the applicant. Also heard Ms. S. Khanikar, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent No. 1 and Ms. M. Das, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 to 5.

                   This is an application for condoning the delay of 217 days in preferring the accompanying appeal. We have perused the statements made in the application. The grounds for delay has been explained at paragraph 2 of the application. We have found that sufficient causes have been shown for not preferring the appeal in time. Thus, considering the statements made in the application, particularly, statements made on oath at paragraph 2 of the application, also for the ends of justice, delay in preferring the accompanying appeal is condoned.

                    Misc Case is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE A. Hazarika]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Dilip Kr. Mahanta]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MS. Renu Prava Mahanta]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.