BEFORE THE DISTRICT FORUM: KURNOOL

Present: Sri. T.Sundara Ramaiah, B.Com B.L., President

And

Sri. M.Krishna Reddy, M.Sc., M.Phil., Male Member

And

         Smt. S.Nazeerunnisa, B.A., B.L., Lady Member

Monday the 24^th day of October, 2011

C.C.No.59/2011

Between:

Smt.D.Maheswari,

W/o Hanumanthu,

Final Year B.C.A.

Bhanumukkala village,

Atmakur Mandal,

Kurnool District,

Now R/o H.No.40-790-7A,

Dharmapeta,

Kurnool-518 004.                                                …Complainant

                                             -Vs-

1. Smt.Vasundhara,

   W/o Venkateswarlu,

   Principal,

   Sri Venkateswara Degree College,

   H.No.7-10-5, Atmakur,

   Kurnool District-518 422.  

2. Sri K.B.Sunkanna,

   S/o Not Known,

   B.C. Welfare Officer,

   Samkshema Bhavan,

   C-Camp Centre, Birla Gate,

   Kurnool-518 002.                                            ...Opposite ParTies

This complaint is coming on this day for orders in the presence of Sri G.Naga Lakshmi Reddy, Advocate for complainant and Sri P.Siva Sudarshan, Advocate for opposite party No.1 and in person for opposite party No.2 and upon perusing the material papers on record, the Forum made the following.

                                              ORDER

       (As per Sri. M.Krishna Reddy, Male Member)

                                         C.C. No.59/2011

1.     This case is filed by the complaint under section 11 and 12 of           C. P. Act, 1986 seeking a direction on opposite parties for the payment of :-

1. Rs.2,500/- as fee reimbursement balance with 24% per annum interest from 01-07-2008 to 22-02-2011.

1. Rs.5,000/- for causing mental agony.

1. Rs.10,000/- towards damages and intentional bad service.

1. Rs.2,000/- as cost of the case.                                     

2.    The synopsis of the complainant Maheswari’s case is that she studied B.Sc. Computer applications (B.Sc. (C.A.)) 1^st year and 2^nd year during 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 respectively in opposite party No.1 College at Atmakur, Kurnool District. She paid Rs.500/- each at the time of admission in the 1^st year and 2^nd year.  She belongs to vadde community and is entitled for fee reimbursement (RTF) to be sanctioned by Government of Andhra Pradesh.  Opposite party No.1 also gave assurance on the RTF at the time of giving admission to her.  In the beginning of 3^rd year she got married and wanted to take admission on transfer in KVR Degree College, Kurnool, where her husband resides. She paid Rs.7,000/- on 07-07-2010 to opposite party No.1 at the time of leaving the college, as opposite party No.1 insisted to pay, saying that she was not sanctioned RTF for the two years studied at opposite party No.1 college.  But the complainant’s husband found on internet that RTF of Rs.4,000/- each for 1^st year and 2^nd year was sanctioned on  behalf of her and adjusted to the college account on 06-03-2009 and 31-03-2010 respectively.  Inspite of repeated requests and a legal notice on 17-12-2010 for the refund of fee paid, no action was initiated by opposite parties.  But after a long time opposite party No.1 sent a calculation sheet and a cheque dated 11-12-2010 for Rs.5,500/- to the complainant, illegally deducting Rs.2,500/- in the name of arrears of fees.  Aggrieved by the attitude of the opposite parties this case is field by the complainant before this Forum seeking appropriate reliefs. 

3.     Sworn Affidavit and documents marked as Ex.A1 to Ex.A11 are filed by the complainant to support his case.

4.     In pursuance to the notice of this Forum opposite parties filed their written versions denying their liabilities to the complainant’s claim.   Opposite party No.1’s version in brief is that the complainant took her admission in B.Com (CA) agreeing to pay Rs.5,000/- every year.  She studied two years 2008 – 2009 and 2009 – 2010 in opposite party No.1  college and was due to pay fee a sum of Rs.10,000/-.  Opposite party No.2 sanctioned RTF of Rs.4,000/- per year to a total of Rs.8,000/- for two years.  Complainant paid (Rs.500/- and Rs.7,000/-) a total of Rs.7,500/- before the sanction of RTF, leaving Rs.2,500/- as fee out standing in her account.  Hence Rs.2,500/- fee arrear was deducted from Rs.8,000/- RTF sanctioned and the balance Rs.5,500/- was refunded to her by way of cheque dated 11-12-2011.  Higher authorities of Government also enquired on the complaint given by the complainant and gave a report stating that the allegation is false.  Further opposite party No.1 avered that the college lost Rs.5,000/- of 3^rd year fees as she left the college in the middle of the course. 

Opposite party No.2 is the District B.C. Welfare Officer, Kurnool.  The version of opposite party No.2 is that he sanctioned RTF to the complainant for two years 2008 to 2010 for her study in opposite party No.1 College as noted below.

Opposite party No.2 submitted that the principal’s of concerned colleges should reimburse the fee already paid by the student as soon as RTF is sanctioned by the Government, displaying a sanctioned list of candidates on college notice board.  He also avered that immediately after receiving complaint from the complainant, he ordered Assistant B.C. Welfare Officer, Kurnool.  Rural (ABCWO) to enquire and submit a detailed report.  Accordingly ABCWO enquired with opposite party No.1 and reported that opposite party No.1 repaid Rs.5,500/- to the complainant through a cheque bearing No.915389 dated 11-12-2010 deducting fee due of Rs.2,500/- (Rs.10,000 - 7,500) out of Rs.8,000/- sanctioned for the two years 2008 to 2010.  Opposite party No.2 finally stated that the issue of RTF was settled and there is no illegal collection of fee from the student.

        Under the circumstances explained above opposite parties prayed for the dismissal of the case.

5.     Opposite parties field sworn affidavits and documents marked as Ex.B1 to B-16 to prove their case.

6.     The complainant and opposite parties filed their written arguments.

7.     Hence the points for consideration are:

1. Whether the complainant made out any case against opposite parties to prove deficiency on their part?

1. Whether the complainant is entitled for any reliefs?

1. What is the quantum of compensation that can be granted?

8.      POINTS 1 and 2:- Admittedly the complainant studied B.Com (CA) in opposite party No.1 college under fee structure of Rs.5,000/- per year.  Ex.B1 is the college fee structure.  She paid Rs.5,000/- at the time of admission in the first year during 2008 -2009.  She belong to vadde community and is entitled for RTF scheme of Government of Andhra Pradesh.  She completed 2^nd year in the same college during 2009 – 2010 and got herself transferred to KVR Government College Kurnool to study 3^rd year during 2010 -2011.  At the time of leaving opposite party No.1 College, she paid Rs.7,000/- to opposite party No.1.  Ex.A1/ B6 receipt for the same.  Opposite party No.2 sanctioned RTF of Rs.4,000/- for 1^st year during 2008 – 2009  on   27-02-2009 and again Rs.4,000/-  for 2^nd year during 2009 – 2010 on 08-02-2010.  Ex.B3 and B9 are sanction letters from opposite party No.2.  The complainant prior her leaving opposite party No.1 college, opposite party No.2 sanctioned Rs.8,000/- for two years (2008 – 2010) on behalf of complainant towards RTF.  As per opposite party No.2 as soon as RTF is sanctioned, the concerned colleges should refund the fee already paid by the student, displaying a sanctioned list of candidates on the college notice board.  At the end of 2^nd year after the adjustment of RTF only Rs.1,500/- fee is due from the complainant.  But opposite party No.1 collected Rs.7,000/- instead of actual due of Rs.1,500/- (Rs.10,000 – (500+8,000)) from the complainant, ignoring the instructions of opposite party No.2.  Therefore opposite party No.1 collected Rs.5,500/- (7,000-1,500) in excess of actual due.  The opposite party No.2 and the enquiry officer appointed by opposite party No.2 during the enquiry without passing any remark on the fee structure adopted by the college accepted the calculation sheet submitted by opposite party No.1 Ex.B1 is report.  Finally the excess collected amount of Rs.5,500/- was refunded to the complainant  in the form of cheque  No.915389 dated 11-12-2010 along with calculation sheet.   Ex.A2/B2 the Xerox copy of the cheque and Ex.A4 the calculation sheet.  In conclusion the complainant in order to get the refund of excess collected fee, was made approach higher officers of Government.  In view of what is stated above the Forum holds that the action of opposite party No.1 is not proper in deleing the issue, and the deficiency of service on the part of opposite party No.1 is sustained entitling the complainant for the reliefs.  No liability on opposite party No.2.

9.      Point No.3:- The refund of Rs.2,500/- does not arise because Rs.5,500/- fee which was collected in excess was already repaid to the complainant by opposite party No.1.  But for the negligence of opposite party No.1  in the verification of RTF orders from the Government and the mental agony caused by him to the complainant to get refund by approaching  higher officers, compensation of Rs.1,500/- is allowed. 

10.    In the result, the complaint is partly allowed directing the opposite party No.1 to pay compensation of Rs.1,500/- for his negligence and causing mental agony.  Rs.500/- is sanctioned as cost of the case.  Time for compliance is one month from the date of receipt of this order.  The case against opposite party No.2 is dismissed.

        Dictated to the stenographer, transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced by us in the open bench on this the 24^th day of October, 2011.

         Sd/-                                            Sd/-                              Sd/-

MALE MEMBER                      PRESIDENT               LADY MEMBER

                                 APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

                                    Witnesses Examined

For the complainant : Nill              For the opposite parties : Nill

List of exhibits marked for the complainant:-

Ex.A1        Sri Venkateswara Degree College Receipt for Rs.7,000/- dated 07-07-2010.

 Ex.A2.      Photo copy of Cheque no.915389 for Rs.5,500/-

dated 11-12-2010.

Ex.A3                Calculation memo sent by opposite party No.1.

Ex.A4                Calculation memo sent by opposite party No.1.

Ex.A5        Photo copy of Complaint dated 07-02-2011 to the

District Collector.

Ex.A6                Receipt from the District Collectors Office, Kurnool

dated 17-02-2011.      

Ex.A7                Office copy of legal notice dated 17-12-2010.

Ex.A8                Internet copy dated 11-11-2010.

Ex.A9                Photo copy of Registered post cover received by the

complainant dated 22-02-2011.

Ex.A10       Office copy of letter of complainant given to B.C. Welfare

                Officer, Kurnool dated 16-12-2010.

Ex.A11       Photo copy of proceedings of the District B.C. Welfare

Officer, Kurnool Rc.No.D/545/2008 dated 27-02-2009.

List of exhibits marked for the opposite parties:-

Ex.B1                Sri Venkateswara Degree College Atmakur fee structure

for the Academic Year 2008 – 2009 dated 25-05-2008.

Ex.B2                Photo copy of status report generated on online system

for 1^st year dated 25-08-2008.

Ex.B3        Photo copy of proceeding of the district B.C. Welfare Officer, Kurnool Rc.No.D.545/2008 dated 27-02-2009.

Ex.B4                Photo copy of statement showing the sanction of tuition

fee, special fee and other fee RC.No. D/545/2008

dated 27-02-2009.

Ex.B5                Photo copy of status report dated 10-08-2009.

Ex.B6                Photo copy of Sri Venkateswara Degree College fee

receipt for Rs.7,000/- dated 07-07-2010.

Ex.B7        Photo copy of proceedings of the District B.C. Welfare

Officer, Kurnool RC.No.D/156/2010 – 3

dated 04-11-2010.

Ex.B8        Photo copy of statement showing the sanction of tuition

fee, special fee and other fee RC.No.D/156/2010 – 3 dated 04-11-2010.

Ex.B9                Photo copy of proceedings of the District B.C. Welfare

Officer, Kurnool RC.No.D/156/2009 dated 08-02-2010.

Ex.B10       Photo copy of statement showing the particulars of the

students in the academic year 2009.

Ex.B11       Photo copy of legal notice dated 17-12-2010 along with

calculation memo.

Ex.B12       Photo copy of cheque receipt No.915389 for Rs.5,500/-

dated 11-12-2010.

Ex.B13       Photo copy of represented letter of  complainant to

District collector, Kurnool dated 07-02-2011.

Ex.B14       Photo copy of District B.C. Welfare Officer, Kurnool Memo

Rc.No.D/70/2011 dated 11-03-2011.

Ex.B15       Photo copy of letter from principal, S.V. Degree College,

Atmakur to District B.C. Welfare Officer, Kurnool in  RC.No.610/SVDC/2011 dated 25-03-2011.

Ex.B16       Photo copy of report of Assistant B.C. Welfare Officer,

                Kurnool to District B.C. Welfare Officer, Kurnool

RC.No.C/3/2011 dated 03-03-2011.

         Sd/-                                            Sd/-                              Sd/-

MALE MEMBER                PRESIDENT                       LADY MEMBER

    // Certified free copy communicated under Rule 4 (10) of           

       the A.P.S.C.D.R.C. Rules, 1987//

Copy to:-

Complainant and Opposite parties  :

Copy was made ready on             :

Copy was dispatched on               :

BEFORE THE DISTRICT FORUM: KURNOOL

Present: Sri. T.Sundara Ramaiah, B.Com B.L., President

And

Sri. M.Krishna Reddy, M.Sc., M.Phil., Male Member

And

         Smt. S.Nazeerunnisa, B.A., B.L., Lady Member

Monday the 24^th day of October, 2011

C.C.No.59/2011

Between:

Smt.D.Maheswari,

W/o Hanumanthu,

Final Year B.C.A.

Bhanumukkala village,

Atmakur Mandal,

Kurnool District,

Now R/o H.No.40-790-7A,

Dharmapeta,

Kurnool-518 004.                                                …Complainant

                                             -Vs-

1. Smt.Vasundhara,

   W/o Venkateswarlu,

   Principal,

   Sri Venkateswara Degree College,

   H.No.7-10-5, Atmakur,

   Kurnool District-518 422.  

2. Sri K.B.Sunkanna,

   S/o Not Known,

   B.C. Welfare Officer,

   Samkshema Bhavan,

   C-Camp Centre, Birla Gate,

   Kurnool-518 002.                                            ...Opposite ParTies

This complaint is coming on this day for orders in the presence of Sri G.Naga Lakshmi Reddy, Advocate for complainant and Sri P.Siva Sudarshan, Advocate for opposite party No.1 and in person for opposite party No.2 and upon perusing the material papers on record, the Forum made the following.

                                              ORDER

       (As per Sri. M.Krishna Reddy, Male Member)

                                         C.C. No.59/2011

1.     This case is filed by the complaint under section 11 and 12 of           C. P. Act, 1986 seeking a direction on opposite parties for the payment of :-

1. Rs.2,500/- as fee reimbursement balance with 24% per annum interest from 01-07-2008 to 22-02-2011.

1. Rs.5,000/- for causing mental agony.

1. Rs.10,000/- towards damages and intentional bad service.

1. Rs.2,000/- as cost of the case.                                     

2.    The synopsis of the complainant Maheswari’s case is that she studied B.Sc. Computer applications (B.Sc. (C.A.)) 1^st year and 2^nd year during 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 respectively in opposite party No.1 College at Atmakur, Kurnool District. She paid Rs.500/- each at the time of admission in the 1^st year and 2^nd year.  She belongs to vadde community and is entitled for fee reimbursement (RTF) to be sanctioned by Government of Andhra Pradesh.  Opposite party No.1 also gave assurance on the RTF at the time of giving admission to her.  In the beginning of 3^rd year she got married and wanted to take admission on transfer in KVR Degree College, Kurnool, where her husband resides. She paid Rs.7,000/- on 07-07-2010 to opposite party No.1 at the time of leaving the college, as opposite party No.1 insisted to pay, saying that she was not sanctioned RTF for the two years studied at opposite party No.1 college.  But the complainant’s husband found on internet that RTF of Rs.4,000/- each for 1^st year and 2^nd year was sanctioned on  behalf of her and adjusted to the college account on 06-03-2009 and 31-03-2010 respectively.  Inspite of repeated requests and a legal notice on 17-12-2010 for the refund of fee paid, no action was initiated by opposite parties.  But after a long time opposite party No.1 sent a calculation sheet and a cheque dated 11-12-2010 for Rs.5,500/- to the complainant, illegally deducting Rs.2,500/- in the name of arrears of fees.  Aggrieved by the attitude of the opposite parties this case is field by the complainant before this Forum seeking appropriate reliefs. 

3.     Sworn Affidavit and documents marked as Ex.A1 to Ex.A11 are filed by the complainant to support his case.

4.     In pursuance to the notice of this Forum opposite parties filed their written versions denying their liabilities to the complainant’s claim.   Opposite party No.1’s version in brief is that the complainant took her admission in B.Com (CA) agreeing to pay Rs.5,000/- every year.  She studied two years 2008 – 2009 and 2009 – 2010 in opposite party No.1  college and was due to pay fee a sum of Rs.10,000/-.  Opposite party No.2 sanctioned RTF of Rs.4,000/- per year to a total of Rs.8,000/- for two years.  Complainant paid (Rs.500/- and Rs.7,000/-) a total of Rs.7,500/- before the sanction of RTF, leaving Rs.2,500/- as fee out standing in her account.  Hence Rs.2,500/- fee arrear was deducted from Rs.8,000/- RTF sanctioned and the balance Rs.5,500/- was refunded to her by way of cheque dated 11-12-2011.  Higher authorities of Government also enquired on the complaint given by the complainant and gave a report stating that the allegation is false.  Further opposite party No.1 avered that the college lost Rs.5,000/- of 3^rd year fees as she left the college in the middle of the course. 

Opposite party No.2 is the District B.C. Welfare Officer, Kurnool.  The version of opposite party No.2 is that he sanctioned RTF to the complainant for two years 2008 to 2010 for her study in opposite party No.1 College as noted below.

Opposite party No.2 submitted that the principal’s of concerned colleges should reimburse the fee already paid by the student as soon as RTF is sanctioned by the Government, displaying a sanctioned list of candidates on college notice board.  He also avered that immediately after receiving complaint from the complainant, he ordered Assistant B.C. Welfare Officer, Kurnool.  Rural (ABCWO) to enquire and submit a detailed report.  Accordingly ABCWO enquired with opposite party No.1 and reported that opposite party No.1 repaid Rs.5,500/- to the complainant through a cheque bearing No.915389 dated 11-12-2010 deducting fee due of Rs.2,500/- (Rs.10,000 - 7,500) out of Rs.8,000/- sanctioned for the two years 2008 to 2010.  Opposite party No.2 finally stated that the issue of RTF was settled and there is no illegal collection of fee from the student.

        Under the circumstances explained above opposite parties prayed for the dismissal of the case.

5.     Opposite parties field sworn affidavits and documents marked as Ex.B1 to B-16 to prove their case.

6.     The complainant and opposite parties filed their written arguments.

7.     Hence the points for consideration are:

1. Whether the complainant made out any case against opposite parties to prove deficiency on their part?

1. Whether the complainant is entitled for any reliefs?

1. What is the quantum of compensation that can be granted?

8.      POINTS 1 and 2:- Admittedly the complainant studied B.Com (CA) in opposite party No.1 college under fee structure of Rs.5,000/- per year.  Ex.B1 is the college fee structure.  She paid Rs.5,000/- at the time of admission in the first year during 2008 -2009.  She belong to vadde community and is entitled for RTF scheme of Government of Andhra Pradesh.  She completed 2^nd year in the same college during 2009 – 2010 and got herself transferred to KVR Government College Kurnool to study 3^rd year during 2010 -2011.  At the time of leaving opposite party No.1 College, she paid Rs.7,000/- to opposite party No.1.  Ex.A1/ B6 receipt for the same.  Opposite party No.2 sanctioned RTF of Rs.4,000/- for 1^st year during 2008 – 2009  on   27-02-2009 and again Rs.4,000/-  for 2^nd year during 2009 – 2010 on 08-02-2010.  Ex.B3 and B9 are sanction letters from opposite party No.2.  The complainant prior her leaving opposite party No.1 college, opposite party No.2 sanctioned Rs.8,000/- for two years (2008 – 2010) on behalf of complainant towards RTF.  As per opposite party No.2 as soon as RTF is sanctioned, the concerned colleges should refund the fee already paid by the student, displaying a sanctioned list of candidates on the college notice board.  At the end of 2^nd year after the adjustment of RTF only Rs.1,500/- fee is due from the complainant.  But opposite party No.1 collected Rs.7,000/- instead of actual due of Rs.1,500/- (Rs.10,000 – (500+8,000)) from the complainant, ignoring the instructions of opposite party No.2.  Therefore opposite party No.1 collected Rs.5,500/- (7,000-1,500) in excess of actual due.  The opposite party No.2 and the enquiry officer appointed by opposite party No.2 during the enquiry without passing any remark on the fee structure adopted by the college accepted the calculation sheet submitted by opposite party No.1 Ex.B1 is report.  Finally the excess collected amount of Rs.5,500/- was refunded to the complainant  in the form of cheque  No.915389 dated 11-12-2010 along with calculation sheet.   Ex.A2/B2 the Xerox copy of the cheque and Ex.A4 the calculation sheet.  In conclusion the complainant in order to get the refund of excess collected fee, was made approach higher officers of Government.  In view of what is stated above the Forum holds that the action of opposite party No.1 is not proper in deleing the issue, and the deficiency of service on the part of opposite party No.1 is sustained entitling the complainant for the reliefs.  No liability on opposite party No.2.

9.      Point No.3:- The refund of Rs.2,500/- does not arise because Rs.5,500/- fee which was collected in excess was already repaid to the complainant by opposite party No.1.  But for the negligence of opposite party No.1  in the verification of RTF orders from the Government and the mental agony caused by him to the complainant to get refund by approaching  higher officers, compensation of Rs.1,500/- is allowed. 

10.    In the result, the complaint is partly allowed directing the opposite party No.1 to pay compensation of Rs.1,500/- for his negligence and causing mental agony.  Rs.500/- is sanctioned as cost of the case.  Time for compliance is one month from the date of receipt of this order.  The case against opposite party No.2 is dismissed.

        Dictated to the stenographer, transcribed by her, corrected and pronounced by us in the open bench on this the 24^th day of October, 2011.

         Sd/-                                            Sd/-                              Sd/-

MALE MEMBER                      PRESIDENT               LADY MEMBER

                                 APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

                                    Witnesses Examined

For the complainant : Nill              For the opposite parties : Nill

List of exhibits marked for the complainant:-

Ex.A1        Sri Venkateswara Degree College Receipt for Rs.7,000/- dated 07-07-2010.

 Ex.A2.      Photo copy of Cheque no.915389 for Rs.5,500/-

dated 11-12-2010.

Ex.A3                Calculation memo sent by opposite party No.1.

Ex.A4                Calculation memo sent by opposite party No.1.

Ex.A5        Photo copy of Complaint dated 07-02-2011 to the

District Collector.

Ex.A6                Receipt from the District Collectors Office, Kurnool

dated 17-02-2011.      

Ex.A7                Office copy of legal notice dated 17-12-2010.

Ex.A8                Internet copy dated 11-11-2010.

Ex.A9                Photo copy of Registered post cover received by the

complainant dated 22-02-2011.

Ex.A10       Office copy of letter of complainant given to B.C. Welfare

                Officer, Kurnool dated 16-12-2010.

Ex.A11       Photo copy of proceedings of the District B.C. Welfare

Officer, Kurnool Rc.No.D/545/2008 dated 27-02-2009.

List of exhibits marked for the opposite parties:-

Ex.B1                Sri Venkateswara Degree College Atmakur fee structure

for the Academic Year 2008 – 2009 dated 25-05-2008.

Ex.B2                Photo copy of status report generated on online system

for 1^st year dated 25-08-2008.

Ex.B3        Photo copy of proceeding of the district B.C. Welfare Officer, Kurnool Rc.No.D.545/2008 dated 27-02-2009.

Ex.B4                Photo copy of statement showing the sanction of tuition

fee, special fee and other fee RC.No. D/545/2008

dated 27-02-2009.

Ex.B5                Photo copy of status report dated 10-08-2009.

Ex.B6                Photo copy of Sri Venkateswara Degree College fee

receipt for Rs.7,000/- dated 07-07-2010.

Ex.B7        Photo copy of proceedings of the District B.C. Welfare

Officer, Kurnool RC.No.D/156/2010 – 3

dated 04-11-2010.

Ex.B8        Photo copy of statement showing the sanction of tuition

fee, special fee and other fee RC.No.D/156/2010 – 3 dated 04-11-2010.

Ex.B9                Photo copy of proceedings of the District B.C. Welfare

Officer, Kurnool RC.No.D/156/2009 dated 08-02-2010.

Ex.B10       Photo copy of statement showing the particulars of the

students in the academic year 2009.

Ex.B11       Photo copy of legal notice dated 17-12-2010 along with

calculation memo.

Ex.B12       Photo copy of cheque receipt No.915389 for Rs.5,500/-

dated 11-12-2010.

Ex.B13       Photo copy of represented letter of  complainant to

District collector, Kurnool dated 07-02-2011.

Ex.B14       Photo copy of District B.C. Welfare Officer, Kurnool Memo

Rc.No.D/70/2011 dated 11-03-2011.

Ex.B15       Photo copy of letter from principal, S.V. Degree College,

Atmakur to District B.C. Welfare Officer, Kurnool in  RC.No.610/SVDC/2011 dated 25-03-2011.

Ex.B16       Photo copy of report of Assistant B.C. Welfare Officer,

                Kurnool to District B.C. Welfare Officer, Kurnool

RC.No.C/3/2011 dated 03-03-2011.

         Sd/-                                            Sd/-                              Sd/-

MALE MEMBER                PRESIDENT                       LADY MEMBER

    // Certified free copy communicated under Rule 4 (10) of the A.P.S.C.D.R.C. Rules, 1987//

Copy to:-

Complainant and Opposite parties  :

Copy was made ready on             :

Copy was dispatched on               :