Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/182/09

M/S NARNE ESTATES PVT.LTD.REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MD, COL.N.RANGA RAO - Complainant(s)

Versus

SMT.SUMITRA VELICHETY - Opp.Party(s)

M/S K.B.RAMANNA DORA

08 Apr 2009

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/182/09
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Hyderabad-II)
 
1. M/S NARNE ESTATES PVT.LTD.REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MD, COL.N.RANGA RAO
NO.1, GUNROCK ENCLAVE, SEC-BAD-500 009.
Andhra Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SMT.SUMITRA VELICHETY
R/O PLOT NO.17, ANUPURAM, A.E.E.CO.OP. HOUSING SOCIETY, LTD. HYD-500 062.
Andhra Pradesh
2. SRI RATNAM V.VELICHETY
PLOT NO.17, ANUPURAM, A.E.E.CO.OP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.
HYDERABAD-500 062
ANDHRA PRADESH
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA PRESIDING MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE THE A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

ATHYDERABAD.

 

F.A. 182/2009 against C.C. 632/2007, Dist. Forum-II,Hyderabad 

Between:

 

M/s. Narne Estates Pvt. Ltd.,

No. 1 Gunrock Enclave

Secunderabad-500 009

Rep. by its Chairman &

Managing Director

Col. N. Ranga Rao

S/o. N. V. Naidu                                                                                                 

And

1). Smt. Sumitra Vilchety

W/o. Sri Ratnam V. Velichety

 

2) 

S/o. Butchiramaiya

Age: 73 years

Retd. Employee.

Both are R/o. Plot No. 17,

Anupuram, AEE Co-Op .

Housing 

Hyderabad-500 062.          

Counsel for the Appellant:                         

Counsel for the Resps:                                                                                                CORAM:

              

                                     

&

                                     

 

WEDNESDAY, THIS THE EIGTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND NINE

 

 

Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)

 

                                                          

 

 

          Hyderabad     

 

 

 

 

2)                   

 

3)                    development charges    

 

 

 

 

 

 

In June, 1997            

 

4)        their plea.

 

5)                  

 

6)                      

 

7)                

 

8)                       

 

9)                                Ex. A3         It is unethical and unjust.

 

10)                     

11)            

“We submit that we are senior citizens      

 

 

 

 

12)             wherein interest    

 

13)          Hyderabad

 

14)     Ghaziabad Development Authority      Ghaziabad Development Authority Vs. Balbir Singh           

 

 

 

15)                     

 

16)                        

17)                            

 

 

 

 

 

18)                 computed at  

 

 

1)                PRESIDENT

_____________________________

          

2)_____________________________

 

 

3)       

_____________________________

 

Dt. 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
[HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA]
PRESIDING MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.