Circuit Bench Nagpur

StateCommission

A/08/60

L.I.C. Of India,Branch Manager,Yavatmal Branch through Senior Divisional Manager - Complainant(s)

Versus

Smt.Ranjana Anilrao Dhandole - Opp.Party(s)

Adsv.Mrs.Rohilla

27 Jul 2011

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR
5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1
CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001
 
First Appeal No. A/08/60
(Arisen out of Order Dated 12/09/2007 in Case No. 145/2007 of District None)
 
1. L.I.C. Of India,Branch Manager,Yavatmal Branch through Senior Divisional Manager
S.V.P.Marg,Kingsway,Nagpur
Nagpur
Maharashtra
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Smt.Ranjana Anilrao Dhandole
R/O Abhay Nagar,Plot No.13,Infront of Hari Kirana Store,Manewada Road,Nagpur.
Nagpur
Maharashtra
2. Vivek Anilrao Dhandole
R/O Abhay Nagar,Plot No.13,Infront of Hari Kirana Store,Manewada Road,Nagpur.
Nagpur
Maharashtra
3. Rashmi Anilrao Dhandole
R/O Abhay Nagar,Plot No.13,Infront of Hari Kirana Store,Manewada Road,Nagpur.
Nagpur
Maharashtra
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. S. R. KHANZODE PRESIDING MEMBER
  HON'BLE SMT.JAYSHREE YENGAL MEMBER
  HON'BLE MR.N. ARUMUGAM MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Adsv.Mrs.Rohilla, Advocate for the Appellant 1
 Adv.Galgalikar, Advocate for the Respondent 1
ORDER

Per Mr S R Khanzode, Hon’ble Presiding Judicial Member

Adv. Mrs A Rohilla for appellant and Adv. Mr Galgalikar for the respondent, are present.
Admit and heard forthwith with the consent of both the parties.


1.      This appeal takes an exception to an order dtd.12.09.2007 passed in Consumer Complaint No. CC/07/145, Ranjana Wd/o Anilrao Dhandole & Ors. Vs. LIC of India, by District Consumer Forum, Yavatmal (the Forum in short). 

2.      This is a case of deficiency in service on the part of appellant / o.p. – Life Insurance Company of India (hereinafter referred to as ‘LIC’), on the ground of suppression of material fact at the time of taking policy regarding previous illness of Late Anil Dhandole.
3.      After the death of insured – Anil, insurance claim was made by his legal heirs - the original complainant, and feeling aggrieved by the repudiation of insurance claim by the LIC, the consumer complaint was filed.
4.      While allowing the complaint, the Forum directed the LIC to pay insurance amount along with 9% interest, compensation & cost. Aggrieved thereby, the LIC preferred this appeal.
5.      Heard.
6.      The only point pressed before us is about the repudiation of insurance claim on the ground of breach of policy condition in as much as suppressing the material fact i.e. his previous illness at the time of taking the policy by the insured - Anil.
7.      Complainant already led an evidence to the effect that the insured was not aware of the Cancer which he suffered at the later period after the policy was taken. At the time of taking the policy, the insured was fully examined by the Panel doctor of LIC. This piece of evidence goes un-rebutted and there is no reason to disbelieve the same. The LIC also failed to justify its repudiation of the insurance claim. 
8.      Therefore, we find that the Forum rightly held accordingly and there is no reason to interfere with it. Hence, holding accordingly, we find the appeal devoid of any substance and pass the following order:-

 

ORDER

 

1.      Appeal stands dismissed.

2.      No order as to cost.

3.      Copy of the order be supplied to the parties.

          Pronounced on 27.07.2011.
 
 
[HONABLE MR. S. R. KHANZODE]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[ HON'BLE SMT.JAYSHREE YENGAL]
MEMBER
 
[ HON'BLE MR.N. ARUMUGAM]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.