BEFORE THE A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
ATHYDERABAD.
F.A. 670/2008 against C.C. 130/2005, Dist. Forum, Khammam
Between:
1. Medical Superintendent
A.P. Vidya Vidhana Parishad
AreaHospital
Bhadrachalam-507 111
Khammam Dist.
2. The Principal Secretary to Govt.
Health, Medical & Family Welfare Dept.
Government of A.P.
Secretariat,Hyderabad.
Smt. Kunja Kondamma
W/o. Kondala Rao
Aswapuram Post
Khammam Dist.-507 116.
Counsel for the Appellant: S.A.
Counsel for the Resps:
QUORUM:
&
MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND EIGHT
Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)
The case of the complainant in brief is that JayabharathiMaternityHospital, Bhadrachalam. They informed 10.00 a.m. she admitted inAreaHospital, Bhadrachalam the 1st The family planning operation was conducted. 12.00 noon 12.30 p.m. When questioned, they came up with false version that the boy
Since she convinced with the version of the doctors,
Appellant No.1/Opposite Party No. 1 filed counter adopted by
was There was ample stock.
filed affidavit evidence of Dr. S. Jayarami Reddy, Medical Superintendent
75% of neonatal deaths occur due to low birth weight
st VikrantScanningCenter, Bhadrachalam, taken on the very same day.
planning
performed to her successfullyAreaHospital. Because of sudden lung infection even though the Paediatrician was attending with all care, the baby expired for the reasons beyond his control. “
Ex. B8 is the
Newborn:
Classification based on Gestational Age:
1. Pre-term baby born before 37 weeks of gestation.
2. Term baby, born between 37 and 42 weeks of gestation
3. Post-term baby, born beyond 42 weeks of gestation.
Classification based on Weight:
1. Low
2. Very low birth weight (VLBW) baby, less than 1500g
3. Very
4. In India
The appellant asserts that sine the baby boy was a pre-term baby and low monitoring of the babies.
Coming to the facts,
Obviously, having satisfied with all the required tests, caesarean The complainant
It is positive case of the appellant that immediately after delivery the baby was shown to the person/employee maintaining the supply of Oxygen cylinders. when she complained about non-providing of Oxygen to the baby.
days less best medical care the boy could not survive.
The other contention that was taken was that the treatment was free of charge, and no RW1 the Superintendent of the hospital admitted that “it is true that we have collected user charges from you Subsequently, the Government by issuing G.O. Ms. No. 163
The learned counsel for the appellant relying a decision
To sum up, the complainant was admitted in the government hospital on 10.6.2004 along with ultra sound scan report wherein it is revealed the weight of child is 2838g,
In the result the appeal is dismissed with costs computed at Rs. 2,000/-.
PRESIDENT
*pnr
“CORRECTED – O.K”.