Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/877/08

M/S NARNE ESTATES PVT.LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

SMT.CH.VIJAYA LAXMI - Opp.Party(s)

MR.K.B.RAMANNA DORA

24 Nov 2010

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/877/08
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Visakhapatnam-II)
 
1. M/S NARNE ESTATES PVT.LTD.
NO.1, GUNROCK ENCLAVE, SEC-BAD-500 009.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SMT.CH.VIJAYA LAXMI
R/O 12-10-336/15/1, SETHA RAM NAGAR, SEETHAFALMANDI, SEC-BAD-500 361.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. SYED ABDULLAH PRESIDING MEMBER
 HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER
 
 

BEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION: ATHYDERABAD.

 

F.A.No. 874 

Between:

M/s Narne Estates Pvt. Ltd.,
No.1, Gunrock Enclave, Secunderabad-009
rep. by its Chairman & Managing Director,
Col.N.Ranga Rao S/o late N.V.Naidu
Aged about 63 years           

                                               

               

 

Smt.Ch.Sujatha  Aged about 40 years, Occ: Housewife
R/o 12-10-336/15/1, Setha Ram Nagar
Sethafalmandi, Secunderabad-361

                                                              

F.A.No. 877 

 

Between:

M/s Narne Estates Pvt. Ltd.,
No.1, Gunrock Enclave, Secunderabad-009
rep. by its Chairman & Managing Director,
Col.N.Ranga Rao S/o late N.V.Naidu
Aged about 63 years           

                                                       

               

 

Smt.Ch.Vijaya Laxmi  Aged about 40 years, Occ: Housewife
R/o 12-10-336/15/1, Setha Ram Nagar
Sethafalmandi, Secunderabad-361

                                                        

Counsel for the Appellant                    

Counsel for the Respondent 

 

QUORUM:  

&

                           

 

                       

                       

 

Oral Order ( As per R.Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member)
                        

1.    

2.    `15,000/- being the cost of the plot bearing number 19, Sector IV, Block-P admeasuring 250 sq.yards. The respondent further paid`50,000/- towards developmental charges on 6.10.2006 and also registration charges of`8,000/- to the appellant as demanded by them.    

3.         

4.    

5.    `20,000/- as compensation and costs of`2,000/-

6.     

7.    

8.    EastCity  `15,000/- towards cost of the plot,`50,000/- towards developmental charges,`8000/- towards registration charges and interest an amount of`3,500/- and thus a total amount of`76,500/-.   

9.      `8,000/- towards registration charges and it has not executed the sale deed nor registered it contending that on account of due from the complainant under the head of developmental charges, the sale deed could not be registered.  

10.      

11.     `8000/- towards registration charges on 3.10.2006 from the complainant which by itself is sufficient to infer that the registration charges as on 3.10.2006 was`8000/- only. `8000/- as registration charges from the complainant if the amount collected is not commensurate with registration charges applicable as on that date or it must not have received the amount.  

12.   `20,000/- under the head of compensation as granted by the District Forum is liable to be set aside.

        `20,000/- awarded in each of the complaint towards compensation are set aside  

 

                       

                                                                        

 

                                                                                                                                      KMK*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HONABLE MR. SYED ABDULLAH]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.