BEFORE THE A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

ATHYDERABAD.

F.A. 1711/2007 against C.C. 45/2007, Dist. Forum-III,Hyderabad 

Between:

M/s. Narne Estates Pvt. Ltd.,

Rep. by its Chairman &

Managing Director

Col. N. Ranga Rao

No. 1 Gunrock Enclave

Secunderabad-500 009                                                                                                                            

And

Smt. Vijaya Kumari

W/o. T. Vinod Kumar

Age: 53 years, Govt. Servant

R/o. A-22, ‘V’ House

Indian Airlines Employees Colony

Police Lines,

Secunderabad-500 003.          

Counsel for the Appellant:                         

Counsel for the Resps:                                                                                                

QUORUM:

&

THURSDAY, THIS THE SIXTEENTH

Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)

          Hyderabad

          EastCity      December, 2000.           EastCity                

Most of the facts are not in dispute.   EastCity She also paid development charges   disputed by the appellant even in the grounds of appeal.                    

Even in the grounds of appeal the appellant could not give any reasons as to why it could not execute registered    Hyderabad.     

The appellant had the advantage of                   2006, an amount of Rs. 50,000/- awarded   

In the light of the fact that the appellant had the advantage of amount all through and it had advantage of escalation of   

In the result the appeal is dismissed. However, not costs.

PRESIDENT