BEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONUSMER DISPUTES REDRESS COMMISSION:
HYDERABAD.
F.A.No.341/2005 against
Between:
M/s. Hindustan Ptroleum Corpn. Limited ,
Regd. Office No.17, Jamshedji
Tata Road, Mumbai-400 020.
1. Smt.V.Adilakshmamma,
2. V.Rangaswamy,
3. V.Puliraju @ Raju,
4. V.Thulasi, D/o.late V.Gopal,
Respondents 1 to 3 are residing at D.No.26-4-965-1,
Thyagarajanagar,, Hindupur Town, Anantapur Dist.
5.
6. National Insurance Co.Ltd.,
Counsel for the appellant
Counsel for the Respondents
F.A.No.632/2005 against
National Insurance Co.Ltd.,
RTC bus stand, Hindupur,Anantapur.
1. Smt.V.Adilakshmamma,
2. V.Rangaswamy,
3. V.Thulasi D/o.late V.Gopal
Thyagarajanagar, Hindupur Town, Anantapur Dist.
4.
5. M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation
Regd. office No.17, Jamshedji
Tata Road, Mumbai-400 020.
Counsel for the appellant
Counsel for the Respondents
CORAMM :
OralOrder :Per
only to the extent of setting aside the order of the Dist Forum. Anantapur in C.D.No.8/2004 dt.31.1.2005
had deputed their the
There is no deficiency in service on the part of the opp.party no1
trade/business.
nd
appreciate the fact that if there is any defect in the cylinder the accident would have occurred on the same day
1.Whether there was any deficiency in service on the part of the opp.parties ?
2.Whether order passed by the Dist.Forum is sustainable?
who was a consumer of H.P.Gas. As there was leakage of gas from the gas cylinder supplied by the 1st opp.party, at the time repairs by one Gopinath fire accident occurred in which the consumer Gopal stst mechanic who repaired the gas cylinder was not their employee.
st and they are st st st
