West Bengal

StateCommission

RC/104/2009

Sri Santanu Mukherjee. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Smt. Ruma Chakraborty. - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Shyamal Chakraborty.Mr. H. Bramhachary.

22 Oct 2009

ORDER


STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION , WEST BENGALBHAWANI BHAWAN (Gr. Floor), 31 Belvedere Road. Kolkata -700027
RC No. 104 of 2009
1. Sri Santanu Mukherjee.one of the Partner C.E.O. (Business & Commerce) beyond 2K Technologies, Chatterjee International Centre, 18th floor, Room No. A-*, 33A, Jawaharlal Nehru Road. Kolkata- 700071. ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Smt. Ruma Chakraborty.D/O Sri Promod Ranjan Chakraborty, C.P.T. Quarter No. A/1, Hellen Keller Sarani, Kolkata- 53. & Presently Residing at P-24, Jubilee Park, Kastodanga Road. Sarsuna, PS. Thakurpukur, Kolkata- 700061. ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 22 Oct 2009
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

No. 1/22.10.2009.

 

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI A. CHAKRABARTI, PRESIDENT.

 

Revision Petitioner is present through Mr. Shyamal Chakraborty, the Ld. Advocate along with Mr. H. Bramhachari, the Ld. Advocate.  Heard Mr. Bramhachari, the Ld. Advocate in support of the revision petition.  The argument of Mr. Bramhachari is against the order dated 17.09.2009.  The said order is quoted hereinbelow. 

 

“D/hr. is absent.  NO E.R. of W.A is received.  It appears on perusal of record that W.A was sent on 21.8.09.  Office is directed to issue fresh reminder fixing for E.R. of W.A. on 11.11.09”.

 

We find it is an usual order with a direction for issuance of reminder in view of no execution report of warrant of arrest and, therefore, there is no question of irregularity.  Mr. Bramhachari has also not shown any irregularity in respect of order under challenge.  In the circumstances the revision petition is dismissed.

 


MR. A K RAY, MemberHON'BLE JUSTICE ALOKE CHAKRABARTI, PRESIDENTMRS. SILPI MAJUMDER, Member