Uttarakhand

StateCommission

A/14/33

L G Electronics India P. Ltd. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Smt. Pragya - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Deepak Kumar

28 Sep 2015

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,UTTARAKHAND
176 Ajabpur Kalan,Mothrowala Road,
Dehradun-248121
Final Order
 
First Appeal No. A/14/33
(Arisen out of Order Dated 03/02/2011 in Case No. 259/2011 of District Hardwar)
 
1. L G Electronics India P. Ltd.
Plot No. 51 Udyog Vihar, Surajpur, Kasna Road, Greater Noida through Aut. Sig. Shubhankar Dev s/o Sorender Dev r/o 1/4 Dhrampur Chowk, Secand floor,Haridwar.
Haridwar
Uttarakhand
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Smt. Pragya
w/o Harish Mudgal r/o 226-A/28, Mudgal Bhawan Khanna Nagar, Gali No. 2 Jawalapur, Haridwar.
Haridwar
Uttarakhand
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S. Verma PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. D. K. Tyagi, H.J.S. MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Veena Sharma MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

The appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 03.02.2014 passed by the District Forum, Haridwar, wherein the District Forum has directed the opposite party No. 1 to pay the complainant a sum of  Rs. 8,000/- cost of the machine and Rs. 2,000/- as compensation and a penalty of Rs. 2,00,000/- to be paid by the opposite party No. 2  as fine. 

Appellant and respondent No. 1 have filed joint application for compromise and requested that the appeal be decided in terms of compromise and the impugned order dated 03.02.2014 passed by the District Forum, Haridwar be modified accordingly.

Sh. Arun Uniyal, learned counsel for the appellant and Sh. Anuj Sharma, learned counsel for respondent No. 2 are present. 

Sh. Harish Kumar, husband and authorized representative of respondent No. 1 is also present and he has been identified by Sh. Arun Uniyal, Advocate.

Before this Commission a bank draft of Rs. 14,000/- has been received by Sh. Harish Kumar, husband and authorized representative of respondent No. 1 and he undertake to return the old machine to the appellant-L.G. Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. within a week.

In view of the said compromise, the appeal is partly allowed and penalty levied on respondent No. 2 is waived.  Order is modified accordingly.

Since, the appeal has been decided in terms of compromise. Therefore, the compromise application shall form part of the order. 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S. Verma]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. D. K. Tyagi, H.J.S.]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Veena Sharma]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.