BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM–II, U.T. CHANDIGARH Criminal Complaint No.78 of 2012 in Consumer Complaint No.243 of 2011 Anudweep Vs. Estate Officer, PUDA PRESENT: Lt.Col.L.S.Bedi(Retd.), Counsel for Complainant. Dated the 27th day of September, 2012 ORDER Counsel for complainant has made the following statement, recorded separately:- “In view of the order dated 19.9.2012 passed by the Hon’ble State Commission, U.T. Chandigarh in FA No.313/2012, I do not press this criminal complaint at this stage. It be dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant reserves her right to file a fresh criminal complaint/execution in terms of the order to be passed by the Hon’ble State Commission, U.T. Chandigarh.” In view of the above statement of counsel for complainant, this criminal complaint is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh criminal complaint/execution in terms of the order to be passed by the Hon’ble State Commission, U.T. Chandigarh, as per law. Certified copy of this order be communicated to the complainant free of cost. After compliance file be consigned. Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- (JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU) (LAKSHMAN SHARMA) (MADHU MUTNEJA) MEMBER PRESIDENT MEMBER
| MRS. MADHU MUTNEJA, MEMBER | HONABLE MR. LAKSHMAN SHARMA, PRESIDENT | MR. JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU, MEMBER | |