Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/571/06

CH. RAGHUNANDAN REDDY - Complainant(s)

Versus

SMT. N.SHARADA - Opp.Party(s)

MS. B.PADNA RAI

11 Nov 2008

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/571/06
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Visakhapatnam-II)
 
1. CH. RAGHUNANDAN REDDY
P.NO 217 F.NO.1 2 FLOOR SY.NO.6 D.NO. 16-11-511/D/27 MOOSARAMBAGH HYD
Andhra Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SMT. N.SHARADA
F.NO. P-1 NAVEEN APTS GOUTHAM NAGAR COLONY GADDIANNARAM DSNR HYD
Andhra Pradesh
2. SMT. LAXMI DEVAMMA
H.NO. 1-8-=37/A/1 CHIKKADPALLYT HYD
HYD
Andhra Pradesh
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

 ATHYDERABAD.

 

F.A. 571/2006 against C.D. 571/2004 , Dist. Forum-III,Hyderabad. 

 

Between:

 

CH.

S/o. Late CH. Ramachandra Reddy

Age: 45 years, Business

Plot No. 217, Flat No. 1

Second Floor, Sy. No. 6

D.No. 16-11-511/D/217

Sai Laxmi Sadan, Moosarambagh

Hyderabad, A.P.1. Smt. N. Sharada

W/o. N. Krishnaiah

Age: 42 years, Business

Flat No. 

Goutam Nagar Colony

Gaddiannaram

Dilsukhnagar,Hyderabad.

 

2. Smt. Laxmi Devamma (Died)

W/o. Late S. Sathyanarayana

Age: 51 years, House Wife

H.No. 1-8-37/A/1, Chikkadpally

Hyderabad-500 020.                                                                                                                       

                                                                                               

Counsel for the Appellant:                         

Counsel for the Respondent:                     

                                                                  

QUORUM:

                       

                                                                         

 

TUESDAY, THIS THE ELEVENTH

 

 

Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)

 

                                                          

         

 

 

 

 

 

 

             Hyderabad                

 

                 The construction was completed by August, 2001.    

 

 

 

all     

 

           

         

 

            

 

                 

 

                 

no meaning.   

In her reply under Ex. A5 Dt. 2. 8. 2003 the builder mentioned “ your client has already been furnished with all the relevant documents, title deeds, link documents etc. when he purchased the flat and my client cannot be asked to furnish any more any longer perpetually.”       

 

            City Civil Court,Hyderabad     It is not a case where   Hyderabad  

 

 

 

 

why he kept quiet for all these years.  authorities      

 

          

 

 

 

         

         

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.