Assam

StateCommission

MA/111/2017

HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company Ltd., Represented by its Legal Officer, Saswata Banerjee - Complainant(s)

Versus

Smt. Meeta Choudhury - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. T. Kalita

25 Mar 2019

ORDER

BEFORE THE ASSAM STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
GUWAHATI
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/111/2017
( Date of Filing : 04 Oct 2017 )
In
First Appeal No. A/55/2017
 
1. HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company Ltd., Represented by its Legal Officer, Saswata Banerjee
Regd. & Head Office at HDFC ERGO General Insurance Co. Ltd., 6th Floor, Leela Business Park, Andheri Kurla Road, Andheri(E),Mumbai-400059,Zonal Office at Metro Towers,10th Floor, 1 Ho Chi Minh Sarani,Kolkata-700071, West Bengal, Regional Office at 2nd Floor, Mayur Garden, Opp.Rajiv Bhaban,ABC,Ghy
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Smt. Meeta Choudhury
W/o Late Amaresh Choudhury, R/o Public School Road, Opposite Public Schoo, Cachar, Pin-788005
Cachar
Assam
2. HDFC Bank Ltd.
Branch Office, Club Road, Silchar-788001
Cachar
Assam
3. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.
Head Office I Nelson Mandela Road, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, Pin-110070
Delhi
4. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.
Guwahati Regional Office, 403, Orion Towers, Christian Basti, Guwahati, Pin-781006
Kamrup(M)
Assam
5. Jain Udyog, Dealer of Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.
Kushal Complex, Sonai Road, Silchar, Pin-788006
Cachar
Assam
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Dilip Kr. Mahanta PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MS. Renu Prava Mahanta MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:Mr. J. Dasgupta,Advocate, Proxy for Mr. T. Kalita, Advocate for
For the Respondent: Mr. S. Smith, Advocate
Dated : 25 Mar 2019
Final Order / Judgement

           Heard Mr. J. Dasgupta, learned counsel, appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. S. Smith, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent No. 2. None appeared for the respondent No. 1.

           This is an application for condoning the delay of 72 days in preferring the accompanying appeal. We have perused the statements made in the application. The grounds for delay has been explained at paragraphs 2,3,4,5 and 6 of the application. We have found that sufficient causes have been shown for not preferring the appeal in time. Thus, considering the statements made in the application, particularly, statements made on oath at paragraph 3,4,5 and 6 of the application, also for the ends of justice, delay in preferring the accompanying appeal is condoned.

             Misc Case is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Dilip Kr. Mahanta]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MS. Renu Prava Mahanta]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.