ORAL
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
U.P. Lucknow.
Appeal No.2485 of 2002
Moradabad Development Authority,
Moradabad through its Secretary. ...Appellant.
Versus
Smt. Maya Saxena C/o Dr. S.C. Saxena,
House No.148 U.P. Avas Vikas, Pili Kothi,
Civil Lines, Moradabad. …Respondent.
Present:-
1- Hon’ble Sri Sushil Kumar, Presiding Member.
2- Hon’ble Sri Vikas Saxena, Member.
Sri Abhishek Mishra, Advocate for appellant.
None for the respondent.
Date 27.1.2023
JUDGMENT
Per Sri Sushil Kumar, Member- This appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 4.9.2002 passed by the ld. District Forum-II, Moradabad in complaint case no.452 of 1996, whereby the appellant is directed to pay Rs.88,000.00 deposited by the complainant alongwith interest @12% p.a.
We have perused the judgment and order passed by the ld. District Forum and heard ld. counsel for the appellant only. None present for the respondent.
On perusal of the record, it appears that the complainant herself requested to get refund of the amount deposited by her. Therefore, there is no liability can be imposed upon the appellant/authority to pay interest @12%.Therefore, this judgment and order deserves to be amended upto this extent that the appellant authority is not liable to pay interest.
ORDER
Appeal is allowed partially. The impugned judgment and order is amended to the extent that the interest shall not be paid by the appellant authority. Rest part of the judgment is confirmed.
The stenographer is requested to upload this order on the Website of this Commission today itself.
(3)
Certified copy of this judgment be provided to the parties as per rules.
(Vikas Saxena) (Sushil Kumar)
Member Presiding Member
Judgment dated/typed signed by us and pronounced in the open court.
Consign to record.
(Vikas Saxena) (Sushil Kumar)
Member Presiding Member
Jafr, PA I
Court 3