West Bengal

Kolkata Unit-IV

CC/24/2021

HILLOL SINGHA ROY ALIAS HILLOL SINGHA RAY - Complainant(s)

Versus

SMT. MAN KUMARI MONDAL & ANOTHER - Opp.Party(s)

CHIRANJIT BISWAS

30 Nov 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION

Sealdah Court Room No. 302 and 309

1,Beliaghata Road, Kolkata-14

 

 

Complaint Case No. CC/24/2021

( Date of Filing : 23 Aug 2021 )

 

1. HILLOL SINGHA ROY ALIAS HILLOL SINGHA RAY

SON OF LATE SRI GOURI PRASAD SINHA RAY, RESIDING AT MEDGACHI, DIST.: EAST BURDWAN, PIN - 713 045

EAST BURDWAN

WEST BENGAL

...........Complainant(s)

  

Versus

 

1. SMT. MAN KUMARI MONDAL & ANOTHER

W/O LATE NARENDRA NATH MONDAL, RESIDING AT 215 V.I.P. NAGAR, P.S -TILJALA, KOLKATA -700 039

KOLKATA

WEST BENGAL

2. SRI RANJEET SINGH

SON OF LATE MAHAT SINGH, RESIDING AT 98, SRIDHAR ROY ROAD, PS - TILJALA, KOLKATA - 700 039 CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY OF

OP NO. 1

KOLKATA

WEST BENGAL

............Opp.Party(s)

 

BEFORE:

 

 

HON'BLE MR. SUDIP NIYOGI                                                            PRESIDENT

 

HON'BLE MRS. MANJUSRI SARKAR CHOWDHURY                  MEMBER

 

HON'BLE MR. AYAN SINHA                                                               MEMBER

 

PRESENT:     Nilarghya Halder       Ld. Advocate for the complainant

 

Dated : 30 Nov 2022

Judgement

 

HON’BLE SUDIP NIYOGI                                                  PRESIDENT

 

 FACTS

 

            The case of the complainant is that he had entered into an agreement for sale of a flat at Premises No. 215, V.I.P Nagar, P.S- Tiljala, Kolkata- 700039 with the Opposite Party No. 2 who was the developer and also the constituted Attorney of Opposite Party No. 1- the land owner. The consideration was fixed at Rs.2300/- per sq. ft. Later, Opposite Party No. 2 also made a declaration to provide the said flat on the 1st floor of the said building to the complainant. He advanced Rs.13,25,000/- in total by making payment on different dates but the Opposite Parties did not hand over the possession of the said flat to the complainant, nor made any deed of conveyance in her favour.  So, he alleged deficiency in service and negligence on the part of the Opposite Parties. He filed the instant complaint before this Commission praying for execution and registration of a deed of conveyance, delivery of possession of the flat including compensation etc.

 

            Opposite Parties did not contest the case. So, it was heard ex parte against them.

 

            Complainant filed evidence and also the documents in support of his case.

 

            The only point for consideration is whether the complainant is entitled to the relief as prayed for.

 

 

 

FINDINGS

 

            We have perused the evidence and also the documents filed by the complainant and considered the argument made on his behalf. The documents revealed that there was an agreement between the parties for sale of a flat measuring about 660 sq. ft. at the premises No. 215/ V.I.P Nagar, P.S.- Tiljala, Kolkata – 700 039. As per the complaint, the price of the flat is @ of Rs.2300 sq. ft. So, the consideration price of the said flat would be 15,18,000/- however complainant paid a sum of Rs.13,25,000/- which is also found from the money receipts produced by him.

 

            Considering the evidence and the documents, we find that the complainant is entitled to get the relief as prayed for provided he would make payment of the entire balance consideration.

            Accordingly it is,

 

ORDERED

 

That the instant case be and the same is allowed ex parte against the OPs.

OPs are directed to execute and register a deed of conveyance in favour of the complainant in respect of the schedule flat as mentioned in the petition of complaint and also to deliver the possession thereof to him.

 

OPs are also directed to pay Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) as compensation and Rs.3,000/- (Rupees three thousand only) towards cost of litigation to the petitioner.

           

OPs are further directed to comply with the aforesaid order within 60 days from the date of this order failing which the complainant shall be at liberty to proceed in accordance with the provisions of law.

 

 

 

Dictated and corrected by me.

 

[HON'BLE MR. SUDIP NIYOGI]

               President                                                                                                      PRESIDENT

 

 

[HON'BLE MRS. MANJUSRI SARKAR CHOWDHURY]

MEMBER

 

 

[HON'BLE MR. AYAN SINHA]

MEMBER

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.