BEFORE THE BEFORE THE KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION |
Basava Bhavan, Sri Basaveswara Circle, High grounds, Bangalore-560001. |
| |
Case No. - A/2297/2011 |
Appellant/s
| 1 . Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. .
B.D. Road, Chitradurga Town Rep. by its Manager (Legal) M.R. Madhusudhan S/o. R.K. Manavi Aged about 48 years .
(By M.J. Alva) |
|
Respondent/s |
1 . Smt. Mahaboobi .
W/o. Late Kuddus Sab Aged about 51 years, residing at Advigollahalli Village Bharamasagar Hobli Chitradurga Taluk .
(By K.Nagalingappa) |
2 . Smt. Balkish
W/o. Late Budensab Aged about 31 years residing at Advigollahalli Village Bharamasagar Hobli Chitradurga Taluk. |
3 . Khaliulla alias Adil,
S/o. Late Budensab Aged about 5 years, residing at Advigollahalli Village Bharamasagar Hobli Chitradurga Taluk |
4 . Kum. Sania,
D/o. Late Budensab Aged about 3 years minors rep. by their natural Guardian & Mother - Repondent No. 2 above All are residing at Advigollahalli Village Bharamasagar Hobli Chitradurga |
02.08.2021
ORDER
Mr. RAVISHANKAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER
1. The appellant/Opposite Party filed this appeal way back in the year 2011 being aggrieved by the Order dt.04.07.2011 passed in CC.No.143/2010 on the file of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chithradurga wherein the District Commission has partly allowed the complaint which directed the Opposite Party to pay insurance amount of Rs.3,00,000/- to the complainants along with interest at 6% p.a. from 25.10.2009, till payment. It is further directed that the complainant No.1 is the mother and the complainant No.2 is the wife and complainant Nos. 3 & 4 are minor son and daughter of deceased Buden Sab each entitled for Rs.75,000/- along with accrued interest thereon. Since the complainant Nos. 3 & 4 are minor son and daughter of the deceased so their share shall be kept in long term FD in any Nationalised Bank till they attained majority by showing the complainant No.2 as the mother cum guardian. The Opposite Party is also directed to pay Rs.3,000/- to the complainant as cost of the proceedings.
2. The appellant not appeared before this Commission inspite of giving sufficient opportunities to address his arguments and to convince how the impugned order passed by the District Commission is not satisfactory and against to law.
3. The case called twice, appellant not present.
4. We have perused the appeal memo. Mere memorandum of appeal is not sufficient to hold the appeal in the absence of any arguments and convincement by the appellant. As such, the appeal requires to be dismissed. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed.
The amount in deposit shall be transmitted to the District Commission for disbursement of the same to the complainant.
Forward free copies to both parties.
Sd/- Sd/-
MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
KCS*
