Learned counsel for the revision petitioner files original certified copy of the impugned order.

Defect pointed out by the office is complied with.

Heard.

In this revision, the revision petitioner has assailed the legality of the interim order dated 22.4.2019 passed by the learned District Forum, Jharsuguda in Misc. Case No. 15 of 2019 arising out of CC No. 26  of 2019.

The impugned order in its entirety reads as follows:-

“An interim petition u/s 13(3B) of C.P.Act, 1986 has been filed by the complainant along with original petition for releasing of his vehicle seized by the OP. Notice issued for appearance and clarification or objection if any to the OP. The OP neither appeared nor filed any objection in support of his case.

Heard from the complainant, perused the materials available. In this case, the OP has financed a vehicle bearing Regd.NO.OD-23-B-7353 to the complainant amounting Rs.28,97,911/- which the complainant was/is liable to repay in monthly installments within 28.12.2019. The complainant submitted that he was paying the monthly installments regularly but due to some unavoidable circumstances, he defaulted some of the monthly installments. As per the complainant the defaulted amount is Rs.2,60,000/- only but the OP is demanding Rs.7,20,510/- only and seized his vehicle.

The complainant has prayed to clear all the dues and agreed to pay 50% of defaulted installments to the OP for releasing of his vehicle where the OP is also entitled to get his dues amount.

In the case of natural justice, it appears us to pass necessary interim order u/s 13(3B) of the C.P.Act, 1986 as it seems to be just and proper when the complainant is interested to clear all the dues amount but seeking some relief.

Accordingly, the OP Branch Manager, Daimler Financial Services India Pvt. Ltd Chennai is hereby  directed to hand over the said vehicle bearing Regd.NO.OD-23-B-7353 in favour of the petitioner/complainant within 05(five) days from the date after receiving of Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand) only from the complainant. The rest dues amount shall be paid by the complainant in 04(four) nos. of equal monthly installments along with regular EMIs.

Inform the parties accordingly and put up on the date fixed i.e. dt.22.05.2019 for compliance report & filing of written version.”

It is abundantly clear from the impugned order that in spite of notice the revision petitioner neither appeared nor filed any objection to the interim application. On being asked learned counsel for the revision petitioner  fails to bring to our notice any illegality of the   nature provide u/s 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 in the impugned order so as to invoke the jurisdiction of this Commission. In the above circumstances, we find no scope to entertain the revision.

Therefore, the revision petition is dismissed at the threshold.