1.      Deepesh Amulla Singh,

wife of Sukhjeet Singh,

2.      Sukhwant Kaur,

wife of late Manmohan Singh,

3.      Navjot Singh,

son of late Manmohan Singh,

all of “Chowdhury  Tower”  Andul  Road,

Village – Thanamakua, P.S. Sankrail,

District – Howrah. -------------------------------------------------- COMPLAINANTS.

-          Versus   -

1.      Smt. Indu  Chowdhury,

wife of Sri Raja Chowdhury,

2.      M/S . Chowdhury Construction,

proprietorship firm

represented by Smt. Indu Chowdhury,

of 4938/A, G.T. Road ( South ),

P.O. & P.S. Shibpur,

District –Howrah.--------------------------------------------------OPPOSITE PARTIES.

                                                P    R    E     S    E    N     T

President     :     Shri T.K. Bhattacharya, M.A. LL.B. WBHJS.

Member      :      Shri P.K. Chatterjee.

Member       :     Smt. Jhumki Saha.

                                                 F  I   N   A    L       O   R   D    E     R

1.               The instant case was filed by complainants U/S 12 of the C.P. Act, 1986

wherein the complainants have  prayed for direction upon the o.ps. to install the lift upto 4^th floor of the schedule property and to pay  compensation to the tune of Rs. 1 lakh with litigation costs as the O.Ps. completely violated the 3^rd schedule of the deed of agreement ( deed no. 04220 of 2011, page no. 15 ) and did not provide the lift facility causing tremendous hardship to the flat owners. Hence the case. 

2.               Notices were sent to the O.Ps. but it returned with the postal endorsement ‘Not known’. But the lawyer notice dated 15-07-2013 sent at the same address was served upon the O.Ps. giving the indication that the O.Ps. manipulated in refusing the notice only to create hardship to the complainants. 

3.        The only point requires determination - whether the complainants as consumers are entitled to the relief as prayed for ?

DECISION  WITH   REASONS      :

4.               . The complainants are very much in possession of the suit flats after execution of the sale deed. On repeated requests the O.Ps. turned a deaf ear and the lift facility was not provided in violation of the agreement. Therefore, it is a fit case where the prayer of the complainant shall be allowed. 

      Hence,

O     R     D      E      R      E        D

      That the C. C. Case No. 359 of 2013 ( HDF 359 of 2013 )  be  and the same is allowed ex parte as against the O.Ps. with costs.

      The O.Ps. be directed to install the lift up to the 4^th floor in the schedule property within 60 days from the date of this order.

      The complainants are also entitled to a litigation cost of Rs. 5,000/- from the O.Ps.

      No order as to compensation.

      The complainants are at liberty to put the decree into execution after expiry of the appeal period.

      Supply the copies of the order to the parties, as per rule.

DICTATED  &    CORRECTED

BY   ME.  

  (    T.K. Bhattacharya  )                                              

  President,  C.D.R.F.,Howrah.