Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/1265/06

M/S JET AIRWAYS LTD - Complainant(s)

Versus

SMT. DHEERAVATH MAJULA - Opp.Party(s)

MS. V.SUDHEER

10 Dec 2008

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/1265/06
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Visakhapatnam-II)
 
1. M/S JET AIRWAYS LTD
M.D F.NO. 203 II FLOOR GUPTA ESTATES 5-9-58 BASHEERBAGH HYD
Andhra Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SMT. DHEERAVATH MAJULA
H.NO. 41-C VENGAL RAO NAGAR HYD
Andhra Pradesh
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

 

 

A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

 ATHYDERABAD.

 

F.A. 1265/2006Hyderabad.

 

Between:

 

M/s. Jet Airways India) Ltd.,

Rep. by its Managing Director

Flat No. 203, II Floor,

Gupta Estates, 5-9-58

Basheerbagh

Hyderabad-500 029.

 

Present Address:

M/s. Jet Airways (India) Ltd.,

RelianceKrishna

5-10-197, ABC,

Hill Ford Road

Hyderabad.

Rep. by its Airport Manager

Vinod Saldanha

S/o. Late Charles Saldanha.                                                         

         Smt. Deeravath Manjula

W/o. Hajinaik Dharavath Manjula

Age: 33 years, House Wife

R/o. H.No. 41-C, Vengalrao Nagar

Hyderabad-500 038.                             

Counsel for the Appellant:                         

Counsel for the Resp:                                

 

 

QUORUM:

              

&

SMT. M. SHREESHA, MEMBER

 

                            

WEDNESDAY, THIS THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND EIGHT

 

 

Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)

 

                                                

         Hyderabad 

 

 

 

 

 

 

           Mineapolis,USA.  Hyderabad  India Hyderabad    Hyderabad  3 hours 30 minutes     USA   USA.  However, it did not arrange.  USA.     

 

                    

 

 

 

best to assist the complainant             

 

           

             and the fact that she was accommodated for two days would show that  

 

             USA      

 

 

 made   When the flight was delayed due to technical snag it cannot be said that there was negligence on their part. Compensation claimed was high and excessive  

 

          

 

          Hyderabad  Minneapolis.  Hyderabad.    

 

              Minneapolis.  

           th 

 

          thth The actual departure of 9W 475 was at 22.05 hrs, which arrived   Dheeravathi and her infant   

 

         

 

         S. RAVICHANDAR)

         

         Hyderabad.”

 

 

 

 

 

         

The appellant alleges that the delay was due to technical snag      

         Lucknow and could take off only at 6.50 p.m. as the aircraft was to come from Delhi to Lucknow and operate the return flight could and leave Delhi only at 05.15 p.m.   

 

“11. Flights may get delayed due to various causes such as poor visibility in the airfield, bad weather, bird hits, tyre burst while landing or take off, sudden strike by any crucial section of Airline staff etc. all of which may be factors beyond the control of the Airlines. 

 

12. It is not the law that mere fact that a flight is operated late will,

 

 

 

 

         Coming to the facts,    Mumbai with her infant, it would have arranged another flight atHyderabad        

 

  The complainant alleges that she came on parole USA and that she had to report by 30.6.2005 USA. India,          

 

 

 

 

 Though the         India    

 

                     

 

           Time for compliance four weeks.

 

 

                  

                                     

         

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.