Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/1070/07

BUTTERFLY SERVICE CENTRE - Complainant(s)

Versus

SMT. B.GIRIJA - Opp.Party(s)

MR. S.JEGADEESHWARAN

04 Feb 2008

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/1070/07
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Kurnool)
 
1. BUTTERFLY SERVICE CENTRE
H.NO.3.6.726 ROMAN PLAZA HIMAYAT NAGAR HYD
Andhra Pradesh
2. GANDHIMATHI APPLIANCES LTD
M.D. V.M.BALASUBRAMANIAM NO.377 ANNA SALAI TEYAMPET CHENNAI
CHENNAI
TAMILNADU
3. LAXMI STEEL PALACE
S.NO.1 SAPTAGIRI COMMERCIAL COMPLEX OPP K.P.H.B.COLONY MAIN ROAD KUKATPALLY HYD
HYDERABAD
Andhra Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SMT. B.GIRIJA
H.NO.1-2-333/F DOMALGUDA HYD-29
Andhra Pradesh
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

 ATHYDERABAD.

 

F.A. 1070/2007 against C.D. 136/2007 , Dist. Forum-III,Hyderabad 

 

Between:

 

1. Butterfly Service Centre

H.No. 3-6-726,RomanPlaza

Himayatnagar,

Hyderabad-500 209.

 

2.LaxmiSteelPalace

Shop No. 1, Saptagiri Commercial

Complex, Opp. K.P.H.B. Colony

Main Road, Kukatpally

Hyderabad-500 072.

 

3. Gandhimathi Appliances Ltd.,

Rep. by its Managing Director

V. M. Balasubrahmaniam

No. 377, Anna Salai

Teynampet, Chennai-600 018.

 

4. Gandhimathi Appliances Ltd.,

No. 143,Vandalaour Kelambakkam Road

PuthuppakkamVillage

Kanchipuram Dist.

Tamil Nadu-603 103.

Tamil Nadu.Smt. B. Girija

W/o. V. Ram Babu

H.No. 1-2-333/F

Domalguda,

Hyderabad-500 029.                                                                                                                                                                                    

Counsel for the Appellant:                         

                                                                  

                                                                  HighCourtBuildings,

                                                                  

 

Counsel for the Respondent:                     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F.A. 1415/2007 against C.D. 136/2007 , Dist. Forum-III,Hyderabad 

 

 

Between:

 

Smt. B. Girija

W/o. V. Ram Babu

H.No. 1-2-333/F

Domalguda,

Hyderabad-500 029.                                                                                                                                                                  

1. Butterfly Service Centre

H.No. 3-6-726,RomanPlaza

Himayatnagar,

Hyderabad-500 209.

 

2.LaxmiSteelPalace

Shop No. 1, Saptagiri Commercial

Complex, Opp. K.P.H.B. Colony

Main Road, Kukatpally

Hyderabad-500 072.

 

3. Gandhimathi Appliances Ltd.,

Rep. by its Managing Director

V. M. Balasubrahmaniam

No. 377, Anna Salai

Teynampet, Chennai-600 018.

 

4. Gandhimathi Appliances Ltd.,

No. 143,Vandalaour Kelambakkam Road

PuthuppakkamVillage

Kanchipuram Dist.

Tamil Nadu-603 103.

Tamil Nadu.Opposite PartiesCounsel for the Appellant:                         

 

Counsel for the Respondent:                     

                                                                  

                                                                  HighCourtBuildings,

                                                                  

QUORUM:

                       

                                                                         

 

MONDAY, THIS THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND EIGHT

 

 

Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)

 

                                                          

 

 

          Hyderabad          

 

          Hyderabad.  She and her husband purchased an LPG    from      to R1 an           her left part of the cheek, left ear, both lips, chest part, abdomen, both     RemedyHospital

 

 

 

 

 

where she was kept in ICCU.                 

 

            While admitting that R1 is the authorised service centre and R2 is the authorised dealer     authorised dealer R2             

 

 

He escorted her out of the kitchen                     

 

           

 

               

 

                

 

 

 

 

 

 

                           

                  

 

                

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

                    

 

             

 

 

reason, when mechanic visited the house, he did not find out whether the     this alleging          

 

We may mention here        

The learned counsel for the respondents         

 

 

             

          She ought to have sent the stove      

 

              

 

                 

 

         

         

 

The assessment of damages       

         

a)   

b)          

 

She claimed an amount of Rs. 3 lakhs towards future expenses.            

 

Coming to the aspect of compensation to be awarded to the complainant, admittedly she was admitted inRemedyHospital                    

 

               ranging from    

 

 

The principle            

Considering the nature of inconvenience suffered, we compensate     and drawing a particular             

 

 

 

 

 

                 

 

 

 

                  

                                               

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.