Maharashtra

StateCommission

A/09/5

KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD - Complainant(s)

Versus

SMT VEENA MANOHAR SHROFF - Opp.Party(s)

Mohit Gadkari & Co.

22 Mar 2011

ORDER

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL
COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
 
First Appeal No. A/09/5
(Arisen out of Order Dated 26/09/2008 in Case No. 281/2007 of District Thane)
 
1. KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD
REG. OFF. 36-38 A, NARIMAN BHAVAN, 227, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI 400021 its Operations Office at 159-A, 1st Floor, Vinay Bhavya Complex, Kalina Santacruz East, Mumbai 400 098.
Mumbai
Maharastra
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SMT VEENA MANOHAR SHROFF
B-1, 604, HARASIDDH PARK, PAWAR NAGAR, THANE (WEST)- 400 601.
THANE
Maharastra
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 Hon'ble Mr. S.R. Khanzode PRESIDING MEMBER
 Hon'ble Mrs. J.D.Yengal MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
Mr.Chinmay Gupte-Advocate for the appellant.
......for the Appellant
 
Mr.Manohar Shroff-A.R. of respondent.
......for the Respondent
ORDER

ORAL ORDER

Per Mr.S.R.Khanzode, Hon’ble Presiding Judicial Member

Heard Mr.Chinmay Gupte-Advocate for the appellant.  Mr.Manohar Shroff-A.R. of respondent.

This appeal is directed against the order dated 26/9/2008 passed in consumer complaint no.281/07 Sou.Vina Manohar Shroff through her power of attorney holder and husband Mr.Manohar G.Shroff v/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Thane (‘Forum’ in short).   

           Consumer dispute pertains to appellant/Financial institution taking possession of vehicle on the ground of default and then selling it but not crediting the sale proceeds as shown appropriated to the complainant.  It is also alleged that the taking possession and selling of the vehicle was contrary to the agreement and, therefore, there is deficiency in service on the part of Financial institution, the fact which was denied by the Financial institution.  Forum accepted the contention of the complainant and directed to refund entire price of the vehicle to the complainant by way of compensation along with further compensation of `10,000/- towards mental torture and `5000/- as cost.  Feeling aggrieved thereby, Financial institution/original opponent preferred this appeal.

Heard both the sides. It is submitted on behalf of the parties that the opportunity to lead the evidence as per provisions of section 13 (4) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 was inadvertently not availed by them and, therefore, disputed facts remain to be  established in the instant case.  This resulted into a failure of justice and, therefore, matter be remanded back to the forum whereby both the parties could avail opportunity to lead their respective side of evidence and then the forum can settle the dispute according to law.  We find substance in their submission and to avoid failure of justice in the aforesaid circumstances, we hold accordingly and pass the following order:-

                                      ORDER

Appeal is allowed.

Impugned order dated 26/09/2008 is set aside.

Consumer complaint is remitted back to the forum in the light of the observations made in the body of the order.

Forum shall give opportunity to both the parties to lead their respective evidence following the provisions of section 13(4) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and, thereafter, hearing both the parties settle the dispute according to law.

Both the parties shall appear before the forum on 28/04/2011.

Appeal stands disposed of accordingly.

Copies of the order be furnished to the parties.

Pronounced

Dated 22nd March, 2011.

 

 
 
[Hon'ble Mr. S.R. Khanzode]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[Hon'ble Mrs. J.D.Yengal]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.