Punjab

SAS Nagar Mohali

CC/6/2016

Surinder Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Sky Rock City Welfare Society - Opp.Party(s)

Pushpinder Kaushal

28 Aug 2017

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/6/2016
 
1. Surinder Kumar
aged about 48 years, S/o Sh. Puran Chand, R/o Ward No.2A, H.No.67, Janta Nagar, District Sangrur.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Sky Rock City Welfare Society
Site office 111-112, Near CGC Collage Landran, SAS Nagar Mohali, through its President Navjeet Singh.
2. Navjeet Singh
President Sky Rock City Welfare Society (Regd.) Site Office 111-112, Near CGC Collage Landran, SAS Nagar Mohali.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  A.P.S. Rajput PRESIDENT
  Mr. Amrinder Singh MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
Shri Pushpinder Kaushal, counsel for the complainant.
 
For the Opp. Party:
None for the OPs.
 
Dated : 28 Aug 2017
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SAHIBZADA AJIT SINGH NAGAR (MOHALI)

                                          Consumer Complaint No.6 of 2016

                                                Date of institution:  01.01.2016                                         Date of decision   :  28.08.2017

 

Surinder Kumar son of Puran Chand, resident of  Ward No.2A, House No.67, Janta Nagar, Dhuri, District Sangrur.

 ……..Complainant

 

                                        Versus

 

1.     Sky Rock City Welfare Society (Regd.), Site Office, 111-112, Near CGC College Landran, SAS Nagar, Mohali through its President Navjeet Singh.

2.     Navjeet Singh, President, Sky Rock City Welfare Society (Regd.), Site Office, 111-112, Near CGC College Landran, SAS Nagar, Mohali

                                                             ………. Opposite Party

 

Complaint under Sections 12 of

the Consumer Protection Act.

Quorum

 

Shri Ajit Pal Singh Rajput, President                          Shri Amrinder Singh Sidhu, Member.

 

Present:    Shri Pushpinder Kaushal, counsel for the complainant.

None for the OPs.

 

ORDER

 

By Ajit Pal Singh Rajput, President

 

                Complainant Surinder Kumar has filed this complaint against the Opposite Parties (hereinafter referred to as the OPs) under Sections 12 of the Consumer Protection Act. The brief facts of the complaint are as under:

2.             The complainant booked plot measuring 150 sq. yards @ Rs.6,000/- per sq. yard with the OPs after becoming member of OP No.1 on 12.05.2011 vide Membership No.TC-1996/R-1525.  The complainant had paid a sum of Rs.9,27,500/- to the OPs from 12.05.2011 to 23.06.2014. At the time of booking the plot, the OPs had assured that the possession of the plot would be delivered within two years of registration. The registration was done in the year 2011. Thus, the possession of the plot was to be delivered to the complainant by 2013.  The complainant had been approaching the OPs for delivery of possession or in the alternative to refund him the deposited amount.  The complainant also came to know that the Promoter Licence of the OPs has been cancelled by GMADA. Even an FIR No.86 dated 06.07.2011 was registered against the OPs at PS Phase-1, SAS Nagar. One of the victim like the complainant has sought information under RTI from GMADA from which it came to light that till date no license for the colony has been issued in the name of the OPs.   Hence the complainant has sought direction to the OPs to handover the actual/physical possession of the plot or in the alternative refund him the deposited amount of Rs.9,27,5000/- alongwith compound interest @ 12% per annum from the dates of deposit till realisation; to pay him Rs.6.00 lakhs as compensation for mental harassment and agony and Rs.22,000/- as costs of litigation. 

2.             The complaint has been contested by the OPs by filing written statement. The Ops in the preliminary objections have pleaded that the complainant himself is guilty of concealing material facts from the Forum. On merits, the Ops have denied the averments of the complainant. The Ops have pleaded that the GMADA authorities vide letter dated 06.05.2014 issued the license in favour of the OPs society for developing the colony at Sector 111-112, SAS Nagar, Mohali. The work is in progressive stage and the society is going to deliver the possession of plots very soon. The Ops have thus sought dismissal of the complaint against them.

3.             In order to prove the case, the counsel tendered in evidence affidavit of the complainant Ex. CW-1/1; copies of terms and conditions Ex.C-1; receipts Ex.C-2 to C-9, FIR Ex.C-10 and RTI letter Ex.C-11. The OPs failed to tender evidence despite availing many opportunities. Hence the evidence of the OPs was closed by order on 08.06.2017.

4.             The learned counsel for the complainant has argued that despite making payment of Rs.9,27,500/- vide receipts Ex.C-2 to 9, the possession of the plot was not handed over to the complainant within assured period of two years from 22.05.2011. Learned counsel has prayed that as there is no sign of development at the site the complainant may be got refunded of his deposited amount alongwith compensation for mental harassment and agony as well as costs of litigation. Neither the OPs filed written arguments nor did anybody appear on their behalf for addressing oral arguments.

7.             We have gone through the pleadings, evidence and written arguments of the complainant and heard the oral submissions addressed by the learned counsel for the complainant. Against the price of the plot, the complainant had deposited with the OPs an amount of Rs.9,27,500/- vide receipts Ex.C-2 to C-9.  When the complainant learnt that the OPs does not have the approvals/sanctions from the competent authority for the project, he requested the OPs for refund of the amount.  Since the OPs have not lead any evidence to prove that the construction work is going on at the site and the possession will be given to the complainant within a specific period, the complainant is entitled to refund of the amount so paid by him. The Hon’ble State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in a latest decision in Ms. Sneh Sood Vs. M/s. Bajwa Developers Ltd. in Consumer Complaint No.240 of 2016 decided on 23.02.2017 has ordered refund of the deposited amount of the complainant alongwith interest @ 12% per annum from the different dates of deposit of different amounts till the date of actual refund.

8.             Accordingly, in view of our aforesaid discussion, we direct the OPs to refund the total deposited amount of Rs.9,27,500/- (Rs. Nine Lakhs Twenty Seven thousand Five Hundred only) to the complainant alongwith interest @ 12% per annum from the different dates of deposit of different amounts till the date of actual refund. We also find that complainant is entitled to a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand only) on account of mental agony due the negligent act of the OPs and litigation cost of Rs.10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand only). The present complaint stands allowed.            

                The OPs are further directed to comply with the order of this Forum within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order, failing which the amount of compensation awarded shall carry interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of this order till realisation.

                The arguments on the complaint were heard and the order was reserved. Now the order be communicated to the parties. Copy of the order be sent to the parties free of cost and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

Pronounced

Dated: 28.08.2017    

                                         (A.P.S.Rajput)           

President

 

                   

        (Amrinder Singh Sidhu)

Member

 
 
[ A.P.S. Rajput]
PRESIDENT
 
[ Mr. Amrinder Singh]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.