Haryana

Karnal

55/2011

Nirmal Singh Mann S/o Lachman Singh Mann - Complainant(s)

Versus

Skoda Auto India Pvt .Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

N.S. Cheema

18 Feb 2016

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.  

                                                          Complaint No.55 of 2011                                                                                 

                                                               Date of instt.: 25.01.2011

                                                          Date of decision: 18.02.2016

 

 Nirmal Singh Mann son of Shri Lachman Singh Mann aged 80 years, resident of village Teha tehsil Ganaur District Sonepat.

.                                                                   ……..Complainant.

                                      Vs.

1.Skoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd. Plot No.A-1/1 Shendra, Give Star Industrial Area, MIDC Tq.and District Aurangabad – 431 201 through its Managing Director.

2.Yuvraj Patil,  Area Head North, Skoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd. 3th Floor, Signature Tower, Gurgaon, Haryana.

3.Nitin Dixit, Head of Technical Department, Skoda Auto Pvt. Ltd. Technical Department, 5^th Floor, Signature Tower, Gurgaon, Haryana.

4.Sidak Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. 71/3, KM, GT Road, Opposite Neel Kanth Dhaba, Karnal 132001 through its Proprietor/partner.

5. Mr.Sanjeev Kapoor, Supervisor  Sidak Automobiles Private Ltd. 71/3, GT Road, Opposite Neel Kanth Dhaba, Karnal.

                                                                           ……… Opposite Parties.

                     Complaint u/s 12  of the Consumer

                     Protection Act.

Before           Sh.K.C.Sharma……….President.                

                   Sh.Anil Sharma…….Member.

Present:-        Sh.None for the complainant.

                   Sh.Vinod Dogra Advocate for the Opposite Party no.1 to 4.

                   Opposite party no.5 ex parte.

ORDER:                  

                                    

                      The case has been called several times since morning but none has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant.  It is already 4:00 PM. Further wait is not justified. Therefore, the present complaint is dismissed in default. The parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and the file be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

Announced
dated:18.02.2016

                                                                    (K.C.Sharma)

                                                                   President,

                                                         District Consumer Disputes

                                                          Redressal Forum, Karnal.

            (Anil Sharma ) 

               Member.