Haryana

Karnal

475/2012

Richa Jain D/o Roshan Lal - Complainant(s)

Versus

Skoda Auto India Pvt .Ltd., Yuvraj Patil, Area Head North, Skoda Auto India Pvt.Ltd., Nitin Dixit, H - Opp.Party(s)

Rohit Gupta

25 Nov 2014

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. 475/2012
 
1. Richa Jain D/o Roshan Lal
H.No. 109-P, Sec-29, Part -2, HUDA, Panipat
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Subhash Goyal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. Shashi Sharma MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.

 

                                                          Complaint No.  475 of 2012

                                                               Date of instt.28.09.2012                                                                       Date of decision: 10.03.2015

 

Richa Jain daughter of Sh.Roshan Lal Jain resident of House No. 109-P, Sector 29, Part-II, HUDA, Panipat.                                                     ………..Complainant.

                             Versus

 

1.Skoda Auto India Pvt.Ltd.Plot No.A-1/1, Shendra  Five Star  Industrial Area , MIDC, Aurangabad, Maharashtra – 431201 (India) through its Managing Director.

2.Sidak Automobiles Pvt.Ltd.71/3  Mile Stone, GT Road, Karnal through its Managing Director.

                                                ……… Opposite Parties.

 

                   Complaint U/s 12 of the Consumer

                   Protection Act.

 

Before          Sh.Subhash Goyal……. President.

                   Smt.Shashi Sharma….Member.

                  

 

 Present        Sh.Nitin Jain, brother of the complainant with Sh.Rohit Gupta Adv.

                   Sh.Gulshan Kumar Service Manager with Sh.Vinod Dogra Adv.for .

 

ORDER:        

                   Sh.Gulshan Kumar Service Manager of OP no.1 has made a statement that he has handed over the vehicle to the complainant and according to the compromise the warranty of the vehicle has been extended for two years  w.e.f. today i.e. 10.3.2015 Extended warrant certificate has been handed over to the counsel for the complainant.

                    Sh.Nitin Jain brother of the complainant has made a statement   that he has received the vehicle, cheque and certificate of the extended warranty and he has opted to withdraw the present complaint.  Therefore, in view of the statements made by the parties, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. The parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and the file be consigned to the record room after due compliance. 

Announced
dated: 10.03.2015                                                                           

                                                              (Subhash Goyal)

                                                             President,

                                                         District Consumer Disputes

                                                          Redressal Forum, Karnal.

                   (Smt.Shashi Sharma)

                             Member.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Subhash Goyal]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MS. Shashi Sharma]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.