Delhi

Central Delhi

EX/34/2012

VISHAL SUNEJA - Complainant(s)

Versus

SKIPPER CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

01 Jun 2016

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Execution Application No. EX/34/2012
In
CC/1561/2001
 
1. VISHAL SUNEJA
E-34, SAKET, AVENUE ONE , NEW DELHI-110017.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SKIPPER CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.
22 BARAKHAMBA ROAD NEW DELHI-110055
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. MOHD. ANWAR ALAM PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. VIKRAM KUMAR DABAS MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. MRS. MANJU BALA SHARMA MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
Dated : 01 Jun 2016
Final Order / Judgement
EX .34/2012
 
1. VISHAL SUNEJA
2. SH VIPIN SUNEJA
BOTH R/O E34, SAKET AVENUE ONE , NEW DELHI-110017
 
                                                                                                        ... DECREE HOLDERS
                                                                 V/S
 
1. M/S SKIPPER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PVT. LTD, SKIPPER BHAWAN, 22, BARAKHAMBA ROAD, NEW DELHI-110001
2. M/S SKIPPER GROUP OF COMPANIES C/O S TEJWANT SINGH, E1 JHANDEWALAN EXTENSION BAU MAKHAN SINGH HOUSE NEW DELHI 110055
 
                                                                                                           ... JUDGMENT DEBTORS
Quorum: Mohd. Anwar Alam, President
Vikram Kumar Dabas, Member
              Manju Bala Sharma , Member
 
ORDER Date: 29.08.2016
Mohd. Anwar Alam, President
 
           None for the parties since   last dates of hearings  i.e.25.4.2014,9.7.2014, 19.9.2014, 19.11.2014, 27.5.2015, 21.12.2015,1.06.2016 and  today consecutively.
Perused file.Order sheet dated 25.2.2014: 
“The RC has already been issued to District Collector to execute the order. The DH shall pursue the matter with the office of the District Collector to get order executed. To come up for report on 27.5.2015.”
As no report received on 25.4.2014 till date nor DH is appearing in this forum, therefore, it appears that DH is not interested in perusing this execution and there is a possibility that the DH has got the order executed through collector.
In the above circumstances it will be abuse of process of law to continue this execution in the long absence of the DH.  Hence this execution is dismissed as accordingly. 
Copy of this order be made available to the parties free of cost as per law and a copy be kept on separate file. File be consigned to record room.
 
Announced on this _______________.
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. MOHD. ANWAR ALAM]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. VIKRAM KUMAR DABAS]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. MRS. MANJU BALA SHARMA]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.