NCDRC

NCDRC

FA/414/2008

MUKESH BHATNAGAR PARTNERS OF M/S. ORBIT TRAVELS - Complainant(s)

Versus

SHYAM SUNDER & ORS. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. SATISH KUMAR BHATTI

16 Oct 2008

ORDER

Date of Filing: 07 Oct 2008

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIFIRST APPEAL NO. No. FA/414/2008
(Against the Order dated 21/11/2006 in Complaint No. 267/1997 of the State Commission Delhi)
1. MUKESH BHATNAGAR PARTNERS OF M/S. ORBIT TRAVELSPartner of M/s Orbit Travels, #203, Inderjit Place, Delhi Gate Market, Now at 34/9, Old Rajinder NagarNew Delhi - 110 060Delhi2. S C HUSSAINIPartner of M/s Orbit Travels, #203, Inderjit Place, Delhi Gate Market, Now at 34/9, Old Rajinder NagarNew Delhi - 110 060Delhi3. NAYYER ALIPartner of M/s Orbit Travels, #203, Inderjit Place, Delhi Gate Market, Now at 34/9, Old Rajinder NagarNew Delhi - 110 060Delhi ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. SHYAM SUNDER & ORS. Through Mrs. Amita Shyam Sunder, W/o Shyam Sunder, Resident of 1814, Sector 22BChandigarhChandigarh2. M/S THAI AIRWAYS INTERNATIONAL Through its General Manager, Ambadeep Building, 14-K G BuildingNew DelhiDelhi3. M/S FAST FORWARD TRAVEL PVT. LTD.Through its Managing Director, Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, 1st Floor, Shop No. 12, Apara Arcade, B - 1/8, Pusa RoadNew DelhiDelhi4. M/S PEAGASUS TRAVELS LTD.Room No. 204, Triveni Plaza, Thai Airways International, 17 - A/56, WEA Karol BaghNew DelhiDelhi ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN ,PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. B.K. TAIMNI ,MEMBERHON'BLE MR. ANUPAM DASGUPTA ,MEMBER
For the Appellant :MR. SATISH KUMAR BHATTI
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 16 Oct 2008
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

          There is delay of 637 days in filing this Appeal. We are not satisfied with the explanation given in the Application for Condonation of Delay.
 
          Hence, this Appeal is dismissed.


......................JASHOK BHANPRESIDENT
......................B.K. TAIMNIMEMBER
......................ANUPAM DASGUPTAMEMBER