Haryana

StateCommission

A/1078/2018

AERENS GOLDSOUK PROJECT - Complainant(s)

Versus

SHYAM SUNDER AND ANOTHER - Opp.Party(s)

SOURABH GOEL

27 Jan 2020

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA,PANCHKULA

                                                 

First Appeal No.723 of 2018

Date of Institution: 04.06.2018

                                                          Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.      M/s Arens Gold Souk project (Hisar Pvt Limited, registered office at plot No.1, LSC-1, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi through its Managing Director Sh.Kailash Aerens, site office: gold Souk Connaught Place, NH-10, Delhi Bye-pass Road, Sector-25, Hisar.

2.      Kailash Aeren, Managing Director of M/s Aerens
Goldsouk Project (Hisar) Pvt. Limited, registered office at Plot No.1, LSC-1, Sharda Niketan Pitampura, New Delhi.

3.      Amit Kumar Aeren, Director of M/s Aerens Goldsouk Project (Hisar) Pvt. Limited registered office at Plot No.1, LSC-1, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi.

     …..Appellants

                                                Versus

 

1. Babu  Lal Indora, Advocate, R/o H.No.31, Sector 13, Hisar.
2. Surender Kumar Gupta Chief Managing Director of M/s Aerens Goldsouk Project (Hisar Pvt. Limited, registered office at Plot No.1, LSC-1, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi.
3. Vijay Gupta, Authorized signatory of M/s Aerens Goldsouk Project (Hisar) Pvt. Limited, registered office at Plot No.1, LSC-1, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi.

         …..Respondents

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellant.

                   Mr.Rohit Indora, Advocate for the respondent No.1.

                   Service of respondents No.2 and 3 already dispensed.

 

 

F.A.No.724 of 2018

Date of institution: 04.06.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

M/s Arens Gold Souk International Ltd. Gold Souk, Block-C, Sushant Lok, Phase-1, Sector-43, Gurgaon 122002, through its Authorized signatory.

…..Appellant

Versus

1.      Sandeep Gera, R/o # 502/18, Vijay Nagar, Hisar, Tehsil and District Hisar.

2.      Harish Kumar, R/o # 58, Post Office Road, Near Adarsh Middle School, Gandhi Nagar, Hisar.

…..Respondents

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellant.

                   Mr.Sunidh Kashyap, Advocate for respondents.

 

F.A.No.1078 of 2018

Date of institution: 18.09.2018                                        

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

2.      Aerens Goldsouk International Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-11034 through its authorised representative.

…..Appellants

Versus

1.      Shaym Sunder Age 35 years son of Shri Rajmal Yadav Resident of H No. 17, G.L.F, Sector 1, Sirsa Road, Hisar.

2.      Director General Town and Country Planning Town and Country Planning Haryana, SCO 71-75, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh.

…..Respondents

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellants.

                   Mr.S.S. Mor, Advocate for respondent No. 1.

                   None for respondent No. 2.

 

 

F.A.No.1079 of 2018

Date of institution: 18.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

2.      Aerens Goldsouk International Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-11034 through its authorised representative.

…..Appellants

Versus

1.      Ranbir Singh Dhull son of Shri Hazari Lal Dhull aged 62 years, Resident of H No. 931, Sector-3, Kurukshetra.

2.      Director General Town and Country Planning Town and Country Planning Haryana, SCO 71-75, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh.

…..Respondents

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellants.

                   Mr.S.S. Mor, Advocate for respondent No. 1.

                   None for respondent No. 2.

 

 

F.A.No.1080 of 2018

Date of institution: 18.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

2.      Aerens Goldsouk International Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-11034 through its authorised representative.

…..Appellants

Versus

1.      Tejbir Singh Dhull son of Shri Hazari Lal Dhull aged 55 years, Resident of H No. 3423, Urban Estate, Block D, Jind (Haryana).

 2.     Director General Town and Country Planning Town and Country Planning Haryana, SCO 71-75, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh.

…..Respondents

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellants.

                   Mr.S.S. Mor, Advocate for respondent No. 1.

                   None for respondent No. 2.

 

 

F.A.No.1081 of 2018

Date of institution: 18.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

2.     Vijay Gupta, M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034.

…..Appellants

Versus

1.      Dayanand Sapra aged 37 years son of Shri Prithvi Raj Resident of H No. 11, Housing Board Colony, Vidyut Nagar, Hisar.

…..Respondent

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellants.

                   Mr.Drupad Sangwan, Advocate for respondent.

 

 

F.A.No.1082 of 2018

Date of institution: 18.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

2.     Aerens Goldsouk International Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-11034 through its authorized representative.

…..Appellants

Versus

1.      Rajbala wife of Shri Dharmender aged 33 years, Resident of VPO Gangana, Tehsil Gohana, District Sonepat (Haryana).

2.      Director General Town and Country Planning Town and Country Planning Haryana, SCO 71-75, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh

      .…..Respondents

 

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellants.

                   Mr.S.S. Mor, Advocate for respondent No. 1.

                   None for respondent No. 2.

 

 

F.A.No.1083 of 2018

Date of institution: 18.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

2.     Aerens Goldsouk International Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-11034 through its authorized representative.

…..Appellants

Versus

1.      Mrs. Meenu Sharma age 45 years wife of Shri Jagmohan Sharma, Resident of Plot No. 52, H. No. 1267, Krishna Nagar, Hisar.

2.      Director General Town and Country Planning Town and Country Planning Haryana, SCO 71-75, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh

      .…..Respondents

 

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellants.

                   Mr.S.S. Mor, Advocate for respondent No. 1.

                   None for respondent No. 2.

 

 

F.A.No.1084 of 2018

Date of institution: 18.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

2.     Aerens Goldsouk International Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-11034 through its authorized representative.

…..Appellants

Versus

1.      Ajay Kumar age 35 years son of Shri Chhabil Singh, Resident of H. No. 146, VPO Riapur, District Hisar.

2.      Director General Town and Country Planning Town and Country Planning Haryana, SCO 71-75, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh

      .…..Respondents

 

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellants.

                   Mr.S.S. Mor, Advocate for respondent No. 1.

                   None for respondent No. 2.

 

 

F.A.No.1085 of 2018

Date of institution: 18.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

2.     Aerens Goldsouk International Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-11034 through its authorized representative.

…..Appellants

Versus

1.      Rajesh son of Shri Chand aged about 32 years.

 2.     Prem Singh son of Amar Singh, both residents of VPO Patan, Tehsil and District Hisar.

      .…..Respondents

 

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellants.

                   Mr.Amit Chopra proxy counsel of Mr. Sunil Narang, Advocate for respondents.

 

 

F.A.No.1086 of 2018

Date of institution: 18.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

2.     Aerens Goldsouk International Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-11034 through its authorized representative.

…..Appellants

Versus

1.      Amit Kumar age 49 years son of Shri Nihal Singh, Resident of VPO Dhana Kalan, Tehsil Hansi, District Hisar.

 2.     Director General Town and Country Planning Town and Country Planning Haryana, SCO 71-75, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh

      .…..Respondents

 

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellants.

                   Mr.S.S. Mor, Advocate for respondent No. 1.

                   None for respondent No. 2.

 

 

F.A.No.1087 of 2018

Date of institution: 18.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

2.     Aerens Goldsouk International Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-11034 through its authorized representative.

…..Appellants

Versus

1.      Ajay Kumar age 35 years son of Shri Chhabil Singh, Resident of H. No. 146, VPO Riapur, District Hisar.

 2.     Director General Town and Country Planning Town and Country Planning Haryana, SCO 71-75, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh

      .…..Respondents

 

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellants.

                   Mr.S.S. Mor, Advocate for respondent No. 1.

                   None for respondent No. 2.

 

 

F.A.No.1088 of 2018

Date of institution: 18.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

2.     Aerens Goldsouk International Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-11034 through its authorized representative.

…..Appellants

Versus

1.      Sandeep Beniwal age 37 years son of Shri Devi Lal Beniwal, Resident of H. No. 316, Model Town Hisar Road, Bhattu Tehsil and District Fatehabad.

 2.     Director General Town and Country Planning Town and Country Planning Haryana, SCO 71-75, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh

      .…..Respondents

 

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellants.

                   Mr.S.S. Mor, Advocate for respondent No. 1.

                   None for respondent No. 2.

 

 

F.A.No.1089 of 2018

Date of institution: 18.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

2.     Aerens Goldsouk International Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-11034 through its authorized representative.

…..Appellants

Versus

1.      Dilbag Singh age 38 years son of Shri Mange Ram, Resident of H. No. 451, Gali No. 12. Shiv Nagar, Hisar (Haryana) now resident of H No. 83-84, Tower Colony Opposite TCP Gate No. 1, Satrod Khas, District Hisar (Haryana).

 2.     Director General Town and Country Planning Town and Country Planning Haryana, SCO 71-75, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh

      .…..Respondents

 

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellants.

                   Mr.S.S. Mor, Advocate for respondent No. 1.

                   None for respondent No. 2.

 

 

F.A.No.1090 of 2018

Date of institution: 18.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1,

Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi

110034 through its authorised representative.

 

…..Appellant

Versus

1.      Sandeep Kumar aged about 30 years son of Shri Subhash, Resident of Banbhouri, Tehsil Barwala, District Hisar.

      .…..Respondent

 

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellant.

                   Mr.J.S. Thind, Advocate for respondent.

 

F.A.No.1091 of 2018

Date of institution: 18.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

2.     Aerens Goldsouk International Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-11034 through its authorized representative.

…..Appellants

Versus

1.      Sandeep Malik age 38 years son of Shri Raghubir Singh Malik, Resident of H. No. 458, U.E.II, Hisar.

 2.     Director General Town and Country Planning Town and Country Planning Haryana, SCO 71-75, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh

      .…..Respondents

 

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellants.

                   Mr.S.S. Mor, Advocate for respondent No. 1.

                   None for respondent No. 2.

 

 

F.A.No.1092 of 2018

Date of institution: 18.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

2.     Aerens Goldsouk International Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-11034 through its authorized representative.

…..Appellants

Versus

1.      Parveen Verma son of Shri Richpal Singh, FH-3, Canal Colony, Hisar presently residing at H No. 2088, Opposite Community Centre, Gali No. 4, Adarsh Colony, Azad Nagar, Hisar.

 2.     Director General Town and Country Planning Town and Country Planning Haryana, SCO 71-75, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh

      .…..Respondents

 

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellants.

                   Mr.S.S. Mor, Advocate for respondent No. 1.

                   None for respondent No. 2.

 

 

F.A.No.1093 of 2018

Date of institution: 18.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

…..Appellant

Versus

1.      Mukesh Yadav aged about 32 years son of Shri Wazir Singh, Resident of Village Kumbha, Tehsil Hansi, District Hisar.

      .…..Respondent

 

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellant.

                   Mr.J.S. Thind, Advocate for respondent.

 

F.A.No.1094 of 2018

Date of institution: 18.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

…..Appellant

Versus

1.      Sandeep Kumar aged about 33 years son of Shri Dharamveer Resident of Village Kanhari Tehsil Tohana District Fatehabad.

 2.     Manoj Kumar aged about 30 years son of Shri Ramphal Resident of Village Datta, Tehsil Hansi District Hisar.

      .…..Respondents

 

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellant.

                   Mr.J.S. Thind, Advocate for respondents.

 

 

F.A.No.1095 of 2018

Date of institution: 18.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

2.     Aerens Goldsouk International Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-11034 through its authorized representative.

…..Appellants

Versus

1.      Sunil Kumar aged 55 years wife of late Shri Mahender Singh Resident of Opp-New Bus Stand, Ward No. 12, Narnaul District Hisar.

 2.     Director General Town and Country Planning Town and Country Planning Haryana, SCO 71-75, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh

      .…..Respondents

 

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellants.

                   Mr.S.S. Mor, Advocate for respondent No. 1.

                   None for respondent No. 2.

 

 

F.A.No.1096 of 2018

Date of institution: 18.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

…..Appellant

Versus

1.      Sunil Kumar aged about 29 years son of Shri Kapoor Singh Resident of VPO Badhawar, Tehsil Barwala District Hisar.

      .…..Respondent

 

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellant.

                   Mr.S.S. Mor, Advocate for respondent.

 

 

F.A.No.1097 of 2018

Date of institution: 18.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

…..Appellant

Versus

1.      Sunil Kumar aged about 29 years son of Shri Kapoor Singh Resident of VPO Badhawar, Tehsil Barwala District Hisar.

      .…..Respondent

 

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellant.

                   Mr.J.S. Thind, Advocate for respondent.

 

 

F.A.No.1098 of 2018

Date of institution: 18.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

2.     Aerens Goldsouk International Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-11034 through its authorized representative.

…..Appellants

Versus

1.      Chander Kanta wife of Shri Ranbir Singh Dhull son of Shri Hazari Lal Dhull, aged 53 years Resident of H No. 931, Sector-3, Kurukshetra.

 2.     Director General Town and Country Planning Town and Country Planning Haryana, SCO 71-75, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh

      .…..Respondents

 

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellants.

                   Mr.S.S. Mor, Advocate for respondent No. 1.

                   None for respondent No. 2.

 

 

F.A.No.1099 of 2018

Date of institution: 18.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

2.     Aerens Goldsouk International Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-11034 through its authorized representative.

…..Appellants

Versus

1.      Ravinder Kumar age 38 years son of Shri Mahavir Singh, Resident of H No. 588/6-P, Sector P-HUDA Colony, Hansi Hisar.

 2.     Raj Kumar son of Shri Krishan Kumar, Resident of VPO Satrod Khan, District Hisar.

3.      Director General Town and Country Planning Town and Country Planning Haryana, SCO 71-75, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh

 

      .…..Respondents

 

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellants.

                   Mr.S.S. Mor, Advocate for respondent No. 1 & 2.

                   None for respondent No. 3.

 

 

F.A.No.1100 of 2018

Date of institution: 18.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

2.     Aerens Goldsouk International Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-11034 through its authorized representative.

…..Appellants

Versus

1.      Rohit Kumar aged 35 years son of Shri Raghubir Singh, Resident of H No. 18, VPO Pali, Tehsil Narnaund, District Hisar.

2.      Director General Town and Country Planning Town and Country Planning Haryana, SCO 71-75, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh

      .…..Respondents

 

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellants.

                   Mr.S.S. Mor, Advocate for respondent No. 1.

                   None for respondent No. 2.

 

 

F.A.No.1101 of 2018

Date of institution: 18.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

2.     Aerens Goldsouk International Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-11034 through its authorized representative.

…..Appellants

Versus

1.      Raj Kumar aged 35 years son of Shri Bhola Ram, Resident of H No. 27/B-10, Ashok Vihar-3, Near Town Park, Hisar.

 2.     Director General Town and Country Planning Town and Country Planning Haryana, SCO 71-75, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh

      .…..Respondents

 

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellants.

                   Mr.S.S. Mor, Advocate for respondent No. 1.

                   None for respondent No. 2.

 

 

F.A.No.1102 of 2018

Date of institution: 18.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

2.     Aerens Goldsouk International Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-11034 through its authorized representative.

…..Appellants

Versus

1.      Parveen Kumar son of Shri Bir Singh aged 38 years Resident of VPO Biran Near Taalab District Bhiwani.

 2.     Director General Town and Country Planning Town and Country Planning Haryana, SCO 71-75, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh

      .…..Respondents

 

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellants.

                   Mr.S.S. Mor, Advocate for respondent No. 1.

                   None for respondent No. 2.

 

 

F.A.No.1103 of 2018

Date of institution: 18.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

2.     Aerens Goldsouk International Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-11034 through its authorized representative.

…..Appellants

Versus

1.      Smt. Charanjit wife of late Shri Surender Kumar Khurana, Resident of H No. 450, Sector-15A, Hisar aged about 67 years.

      .…..Respondent

 

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellants.

                   Mr.Amit Chopra proxy counsel for Mr. Sunil Narang, Advocate for respondent.

 

 

F.A.No.1136 of 2018

Date of institution: 26.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

2.     Aerens Goldsouk International Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-11034 through its authorized representative.

…..Appellants

Versus

1.      Bhupender Singh son of Shri Ratan Singh aged 54 years Resident of H. No. 454, Shiv Colony, Rewari.

 2.     Director General Town and Country Planning Town and Country Planning Haryana, SCO 71-75, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh

      .…..Respondents

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellants.

                    Mr.S.S. Mor, Advocate for respondent No. 1.

                   None for respondent No. 2.

 

F.A.No.1137 of 2018

Date of institution: 26.09.2018

Date of Decision: 27.01.2020

 

1.     M/s Aerens Goldsouk Projects (Hisar) Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-110034 through its authorised representative.

2.     Aerens Goldsouk International Ltd. Plot No. 1, Wedding Mall, LSC, Sharda Niketan, Pitampura, New Delhi-11034 through its authorized representative.

…..Appellants

Versus

1.      Savitri Devi aged 55 years wife of Late Shri Mahender Singh Resident of Opp-New Bus Stand, Ward No. 12, Narnaul, District Hisar.

 2.     Director General Town and Country Planning Town and Country Planning Haryana, SCO 71-75, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh

      .…..Respondents

CORAM:   Mr.Justice T.P.S.Mann, President

Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary, Judicial Member.
 

 

Present:-    Mr.Amit Singla, Advocate for appellants.

                   Mr.S.S. Mor, Advocate for respondent No. 1.

                   None for respondent No. 2.

 

O R D E R

 

RAM SINGH CHAUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

 

Delay in filing the appeals are condoned for the reasons mentioned in the applications filed for condonation of delay.

2.      Vide this order above mentioned thirty appeals, bearing Nos.723 of 2018, F.A. No.724 of 2018, F.A. No.1078 of 2018 to 1103 of 2018, F.A. No.1136 of 2018 and F.A.1137 of 2018, will be disposed of, as said appeals are directed against orders passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Hisar (in short ‘District Forum’) on respective dates.

3.      Since there are thirty appeals   arising out of the common order passed by the learned District Forum, Hisar and since all the appeals bearing Nos.723 of 2018, F.A. No.724 of 2018, F.A. No.1078 of 2018 to 1103 of 2018, F.A. No.1136 of 2018 and F.A.1137 of 2018 are based on identical facts and law are involved between the same parties and also the similar interpretation of law, the State Commission has opted to decide these appeals by way of passing one common order.

4.      It is relevant to make a reference here that against order dated 22.08.2019 in First Appeal No.723 of 2018 by this Commission, complainant filed Revision petition No.2257 of 2019 before the Hon’ble National Commission, copy of the order passed by the Hon’ble National Commission was received wherein directions were issued to this Commission to dispose of the Appeal No.723 of 2018 expeditiously.  On this ground, the appeal No.723 of 2018 has been treated to be a main appeal in which the order regarding the disposal of the remaining appeals would be recorded.

5.      Briefly stated, the facts narrated in the complaint are that the opposite party No.1 had launched a scheme of Gold Souk, Hisar and complainant purchased a shop by depositing Rs.2,00,000/- vide cheque No.142792 dated 01.03.2012.  The complainant was allotted the temporary number of Shop as F-105 at First Floor. The total cost of the shop was Rs.15,40,000/-. The project will be completed by December, 2014 with a grace period of 6 months and advance payment of Rs.3,85,000/- to be paid by the complainant. Agreement was executed between the parties.  In total, the complainant has paid Rs.12,71,856/- till 31.03.2014 out of the total sale consideration of Rs.15,40,000/-.  More than 4 ½ years has been elapsed, but, there was no developmental activities except one skelton structure in the form of pillars has been raised.   On 04.08.2016, he requested the respondents to refund the amount, but, O.Ps. denied to refund.  As per letter dated 04.08.2016 sent by the opposite parties vide which they will hand over the possession of the shop in question till 31.12.2017.  The complainant again requested to refund his money alongwith interest but they flatly refused to accept the request of complainant. Hence the complaint.

6.      O.P Nos.1 to 3 filed their joint written statement by taking various preliminary objections about estoppal, accruing cause of action, locus standi, etc. and requested to dismiss the complaint.

7.      On merits,  the execution of the agreement was denied.  All the developmental work at the spot has already been completed. The project was ready to deliver the possession. The complainant was liable to pay the entire amount towards the costs of the shop, but, the complainant was not having the sufficient fund, has adopted a unique method for filing the present complaint just to harass and humiliate the opposite party.

8.      O.P. Nos.4 and 5 were proceeded against ex parte vide order dated 30.08.2017.

9.      After hearing both the parties, learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Hisar (in short ‘District Forum’) allowed the complaint and directed as under:-

“Hence, there is merit in this complaint, the same is hereby accepted with the direction to the respondent Nos.1 to 3 to refund the deposited amount by the complainant alongwith interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing of the present complaint i.e. from 23.02.2017 till its realization.  The respondents No.1 to 3 are further burdened with compensation and cost of litigation which we quantify at lump-sum amount of Rs.5000/- to be paid to the complainant on account of mental agony, harassment etc. suffered due to the deficient and negligent act of the respondents.”

10.    Feeling aggrieved against the order, O.P. No.1 to 3 have preferred above said appeals as learned District Forum failed to take into consideration all the relevant aspects. It is further prayed that impugned order dated 26.03.2018 passed by learned District Forum, Hisar be set-aside and complaint be dismissed.

11.    This arguments have been advanced by Sh.Amit Singla the learned counsel for all the appellants as well as Sh.Rohit Indora, the learned counsel for the respondent No.1 in all of the complainant and also the other learned counsel for the respondents-complainants as fully referred in the memos of the parties. With their kind assistance the entire appellate record and that of the District Forum has also been properly perused and examined.

12.    As far as the payment of the amount in individual complaint as referred above is not disputed.  The allotment of the unit at fixed price as well as execution of the buyer agreement is also not in dispute.  Since the opposite parties have not been able to maintain the discipline as per the terms and conditions incorporated in the buyers agreement for the purpose of delivery of the possession of the individual units to the complainants as referred above, in spite of the fact that more than a period of eight years had expired, but, the reasons are best known to the present appellants-opposite parties, as to why the possession has not been delivered within the stipulated period to the complainant.  It was also noticed while addressing the arguments that on the proposed date of delivery of possession, the appellants were not having the licence, which has already been cancelled by the State Authorities on account of certain reasons or the facts and circumstances which could not be completed by the builders.          

13.    As far as the order passed by the learned District Forum is concerned, it is well reasoned based on appreciation of law and including the oral as well as documentary evidence and as such, no grounds to interfere in the impugned order dated 26.03.2018  and other respective dates passed by learned District Forum,  Hisar vide which the complaints were allowed and as such, the appeals being devoid of merits stands dismissed, while affirming the order passed by the learned District Forum in all the complaints.

14.              The statutory amount of Rs.25,000/- each deposited at the time of filing of the appeal bearing Nos.723 of 2018, F.A. No.724 of 2018, F.A. No.1078 of 2018 to 1103 of 2018, F.A. No.1136 of 2018 and F.A.1137 of 2018 be refunded to the complainants  against proper receipt and identification.

15.    This order has been rendered in the appeal bearing F.A. No.723 of 2018 and the copies of this order be also placed on the other respective connected appeals as mentioned in the memo of parties.

 

 

January 27th, 2020          Ram Singh Chaudhary,             T.P.S.Mann,                              Judicial Member                           President                                  

S.K.(Pvt.Secy)