West Bengal

StateCommission

A/120/2024

SIRAJUL MISTRI AND ANOTHER - Complainant(s)

Versus

SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE LIMITED AND ANOTHER - Opp.Party(s)

PRASANTA BANERJEE

30 Oct 2024

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
WEST BENGAL
11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087
 
First Appeal No. A/120/2024
( Date of Filing : 03 May 2024 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 08/01/2024 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/133/2023 of District Kolkata-III(South))
 
1. SIRAJUL MISTRI AND ANOTHER
MASJID KHAN PARA, RAJAKGOHALIA, P.O.-DOSTINE, P.S.-BARUIPUR, KAYARADANGA PANCHAYAT,DISTRICT-24 PARGANAS SOUTH, PIN-743503
24 PARAGANAS SOUTH
WEST BENGAL
2. SAHARUKH MISTRY
VILLAGE-RAJAKGOHALIA, P.O.-DOSTINA, P.S.-BISHNUPUR, KAYARADANGA PANCHAYET, DISTRICT-24 PARGANAS SOUTH, PIN-743503
24 PARAGANAS SOUTH
WEST BENGAL
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE LIMITED AND ANOTHER
EP-21, SAHID PURNENDU NAGAR, THAKURPUKUR, KOLKATA-700063, P.S.-THAKURPUKUR, DISTRICT-24- PARGANAS SOUTH
KOLKATA
WEST BENGAL
2. THE MANAGER SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED,.
EP-21, SAHID PURNENDU NAGAR, THAKURPUKUR, KOLKATA-700063, P.S.-THAKURPUKUR, DISTRICT-24- PARGANAS SOUTH
24 PARAGANAS SOUTH
WEST BENGAL
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. AJEYA MATILAL PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. NITYASUNDAR TRIVEDI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:PRASANTA BANERJEE, Advocate for the Appellant 1
 Barun Prasad., Advocate for the Respondent 1
Dated : 30 Oct 2024
Final Order / Judgement

Hon’ble Mr. Ajeya Matilal, Presiding Member

Both sides are present through their respective Ld. Counsels.

The Petition for condonaiton of delay is taken up for hearing.

Ld. Counsel for the Appellant submitted that the CC/133/2023 was at evidence stage.  Due to miscommunication between the Complainant and his Ld. Counsel the Complainant could not take step.  So that matter was dismissed for non-prosecution and the Appellant has prayed for restoring of complaint case.

In reply the Counsel for the Respondent submitted that it is not correct that the matter was not within the knowledge of the Complainant.  He drew our attention to the order sheets of the Ld. Commission below and further submitted that on three consecutive dates the Complainant was absent without taking appropriate steps.

Heard all concerned.

Considering the facts and circumstances, the Petition for condonation of delay is allowed subject to payment of cost of Rs.1000/ (Rupees One thousand) only payable to the Respondent.

On such condition the Appeal is admitted.

It appears from the submissions of the Ld. Counsel for the Appellant that he is willing to contest the matter before the Commission below.

In view of submissions made by the parties the Appeal is allowed.

Impugned order is set aside.

Ld. Commission below is requested to dispose of the case within three months from the date of their appearance after giving opportunities of both sides of being heard without being influenced by the observation made by this Commission.

Parties are directed to appear before the Ld. Commission below on 14.11.2024

Let a copy of this order be sent down to the Ld. Commission below.

The Appellant paid cost of Rs.1000/- (Rupees One thousand) only to the Ld. Counsel for the Respondent which is received by him.

Let the receipt be kept with the record.

Thus, the Appeal stands disposed of.

Note accordingly.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. AJEYA MATILAL]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NITYASUNDAR TRIVEDI]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.