View 7877 Cases Against Transport
View 30724 Cases Against Finance
View 1584 Cases Against Shriram Transport Finance
Biraj Panigrahi filed a consumer case on 25 Jul 2022 against Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd. in the Sambalpur Consumer Court. The case no is CC/21/2014 and the judgment uploaded on 28 Jul 2022.
PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SAMBALPUR
Consumer.Case No.- 21/2014
Present-Dr. Ramakanta Satapathy, President,
Sri. Sadananda Tripathy, Member
Sri. Biraj Panigrahi,
S/O- Santapani Panigrahi
R/O-Panchamukhi Chowk, Kuchinda, Po/PS-Kuchinda,
Dist-Sambalpur,Odisha-768222 …..Complainant
Vrs.
Hara Gouri Vihar, Infront of TELCO Service Centre,
Near N.H.6, Ainthapali, Sambalpur.
Advocate Sambalpur for Shriram Finance Company Ltd.
At/Po/Ps/Dist-Sambalpur ….Opp. Parties
Counsels:-
DATE OF HEARING :XXXXX DATE OF JUDGEMENT : 25.07.2022
Dr. Ramakanta Satapathy, PRESIDENT:
The Complainant received an advocate notice on 12.12.2013 from the O.P. No.2 and know that 24% interest P.A. has been charged. The Complainant has surrendered the vehicle in good condition. The O.P. No.1 made the auction sale on 28.10.2013 for Rs. 75,000/- and in the advocate notice stated that the auction was made in his presence. The Complainant challenged the auction sale and claimed for compensation.
The case was referred for arbitration to the sole Arbitrator Mr. M.C. Rath vide Arb. Case No. 1531/14 No illegality or irregularity has been committed by the O.P. No.1 and the Complainant is not entitled for any compensation.
The O.P. No.1 before going to arbitration issued notices to the Complainant, the Complainant surrendered the vehicle, inventory made on 29.11.2011 and before auction sale issued notice dated 30.11.2011 and finally gave sale notice on 19.12.2011.
In the present case the Complainant has not come to the Forum/Commission in clean hand. The Complainant has not whispered single word regarding arbitration case. Later also no any order of the higher court filed against the arbitration award. The award passed by the arbitrator is binding on the parties.
An aggrieved person is entitled for compensation when there is actual damage caused. In the instant case as the Complainant voluntarily surrendered the vehicle to the O.P. No.1, made a party to the advocate for O.P. No.1 i.e. O.P. No.2 which clearly reflects the attitude of the Complainant. Accordingly, we are not inclined to given any order for compensation to the complainant.
The complaint is dismissed on contest. No cost.
Order pronounced in open court on this 25th July 2022.
Supply free copies to the parties.
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.