Before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rohtak.

                                                                   Complaint No. : 407

                                                                   Instituted on     : 20.08.2019.

                                                                   Decided on       : 04.10.2023

Sandeep Nandal  age 42 years, w/o Sh. Raghbir Singh R/o H.No.474/30, Gali No. 2, Dev Colony, Rohtak.                                                                               

                                                                   ......................Complainant.

                             Vs.

1. Shriram Life Insurance Company Limited, 5^th Floor, Plot No.31-32, Ramky Selenium, Financial District, Gachibowli, Hyderabad-500032 through its Director/CMD.
2. Shriram Life Insurance Company Limited, 2^nd Floor, Ashoka Plaza, Delhi Road, Rohtak, through its M.D.
3. Pradnya Ashok Chavan, Sales Officer Shriram Life Insurance 5^th Floor, Plot No.31-32, Ramky Selenium, Financial District, Gachibowli, Hyderabad-500032.

                                                                   ...........…….Opposite parties.

          COMPLAINT U/S 35 OF CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT,2019

BEFORE:  SH.NAGENDER SINGH KADIAN, PRESIDENT.

                   DR. TRIPTI PANNU, MEMBER.

                   DR.VIJENDER SINGH, MEMBER

Present:       Sh.Pardeep Mittal, Advocate for the complainant.

                   Sh.Gulshan Chawla Advocate for the opposite parties No. 1 and 2.

                   Opposite party no. 3 already exparte.

                                      ORDER

NAGENDER SINGH KADIAN, PRESIDENT:

1.                Brief facts of the case as per the complainant are that in the month of September and November 2012, the complainant and his wife had purchased two life insurance policies from Max Life Insurance Company vide policy number 869636274 and 873321970 respectively. It is further submitted that in the month of March 2018, the wife of complainant started receiving telephonic calls from number 8376031205 and 9355169308 who named herself as Mandakini and asked that complainant and his wife  will get bonus of Rs.5,80,000/- in the aforesaid policies when the complainant or her husband invest about Rs.6,80,000/- in various policies as per directions of said Mandakini. She also assured the complainant that this is one time investment and she will get the policies canceled and will return the entire amount alongwith said bonus to the complainant. Opposite parties in collusion with Mandakini and some others, misappropriated an amount of Rs.6,80,000/- of the complainant in following policies which were issued in the name of the complainant and his wife:-

The payment for the aforesaid all the policies were made from the account of the complainant and his wife i.e. A/c No. 204010100096025 and 204010100067421 respectively maintained with Axis Bank, Rohtak. It is further submitted that policy no. 3 in the above said table was issued by the opposite parties no. 1 & 2 wherein opposite party no. 3 was named as agent. Thereafter the complainant did not receive any bonus amount even after the aforesaid investment and thus the complainant and his wife talked with said Mandakini but she did not give any satisfactory reply. Complainant asked to Mandakini many times to return the amount and get the said policies cancelled. Upon this he got cancelled above said two policies of HDFC Standard Life Insurance Co. Ltd. and one policy of India First Life Insurance. The complainant again requested to get cancel all the policies and return the amount alongwith bonus but she did not pay any heed towards genuine requests of complainant. Thereafter on 17.12.2018, the wife of complainant moved a complaint to Bharti AXA Life Insurance Company Limited and on 18.12.2018 to Max Life Insurance Company in this regard. The wife of complainant also moved an application to opposite party Shri Ram Life Insurance on 02.01.2019 and got lodged a complaint in IRDA. In March 2019 a representation was also given to opposite party through IRDA but they did not pay any heed towards the genuine requests of the complainant. The act of opposite party is illegal and amounts to deficiency in service. Hence this complaint and it is prayed that opposite parties may kindly be directed to refund an amount of Rs.99125/- alongwith interest @ 18% per annum w.e.f. 20.07.2018 till its actual realization. It is also prayed that opposite parties be directed to pay Rs.50,000/- as compensation and Rs.21,000/- as litigation expenses to the complainant as explained in relief clause.

2.                After registration of complaint, notices were issued to the opposite parties. Opposite party No.3 did not appear despite service of notice through registered post and as such opposite party No.3 was proceeded against exparte vide order dated 03.10.2019 of this Commission. Opposite party No.1 & 2 filed their reply submitting therein that the complainant had proposed for a life insurance policy in his name by submitting a proposal form and by paying the proposal deposit amount. The opposite parties after underwriting the proposal issued a policy covering the life of Mr. Sandeep Nandal vide policy bearing No.NN011807108905 which has commenced on 20.07.2018 for a sum assured amount of Rs.920,000/- with additional Accidental Rider benefits of AR & FIB under the plan ‘Shriram Life Assured Income Plan’ for a term of 10 years with annual renewal premium amount of Rs.99125/- payable for a period of 10 years. The policy document was dispatched to the communication address of the complainant and the same was delivered to her well within time. On receiving the policy document, the complainant did not make any complaint or request with the opposite parties regarding the subject matter of the policy. Alongwith policy document the opposite parties sent a covering letter which clearly mentioned that, if the policy holder was not satisfied with the terms and conditions of the policy, then he had the option for seeking cancellation of the policies within 15 days from the date of receipt of the policy giving the reason there of under the option Free Look Period. It is further submitted that 2^nd annual premium fell due on 20.07.2019, which was not paid by the complainant even after sending automated reminders.  As such, policy lapsed on 20.07.2019. The complainant had raised a complaint with IGMS Portal of IRDAI which was duly replied by the opposite parties on 25.03.2019. All the other contents of the complaint were stated to be wrong & denied and opposite parties prayed for dismissal of complaint with costs. 

3.                Ld. Counsel for the complainant in his evidence has tendered affidavit Ex.CW1/A, documents Ex.C1 to Ex.C28 and has closed his evidence on dated 18.12.2020.  Ld. counsel for the opposite parties No. 1 & 2 has tendered affidavit Ex.RW1/1, documents Ex.R1 to Ex.R4 and closed his evidence on 19.02.2021. 

4.                We have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through material aspects of the case very carefully.

5.                 In the present case, complainant has alleged that the insurance policies were sold by the agent of the opposite parties fraudulently and he has also specifically mentioned the telephone numbers through which the telephone calls were made to the complainant or his wife. It is the prime duty of the insurance company when they received a complaint that the policy has been sold out fraudulently by their agent  or any authorized person, the insurance company should enquire their whereabouts or about these telephone numbers or also enquire about the agent or any authorized person who sold these policies to the customers/consumers. Complainant has no source of such a huge income that he can purchase the alleged 7 polices during the 3-4 months. Now it has been established that these policies have been sold out by the authorized agents or their representative fraudulently after giving assurances that if they invest a sum of Rs.680000/- in different companies, in that situation they have a chance to get bonus of Rs.5,80,000/-. It was also assured that this was one time investment and the entire amount will be returned after cancellation of these policies. But despite repeated requests of the complainant, policy was not cancelled by the opposite parties. At the time of arguments, ld. counsel for the complainant has placed on record a document  ‘Annexure-JN-A’. Perusal of this document itself shows that on the request of complainant, policy no.10511428 has been cancelled by India First Life Insurance company and the premium paid by the complainant amounting  to Rs.79999/- has been credited in the account of complainant. Similarly an amount of Rs.50000/- has been credited twice by the HDFC STD life Insurance Co. on account of refund of premium in the account of complainant. Hence it is proved that the policies were fraudulently sold by the agent or authorized representative of the opposite parties but the amount of insurance policy no.NN011807108905 issued by the opposite party has not been refunded to the complainant despite her repeated requests. Hence there is deficiency in service on the part of opposite parties and opposite parties are liable to refund the premium of policy to the complainant.

6.                In view of the facts and circumstances of the case we hereby allow the compliant and direct the opposite parties to refund the amount of Rs.99125/-(Rupees ninety nine thousand one hundred and twenty five only) alongwith interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of filing the present  complaint i.e. 20.8.2019 till its realization and shall also pay a sum of Rs.5000/-(Rupees five thousand only) as compensation on account of deficiency in service and Rs.5000/-(Rupees five thousand only) as litigation expenses to the complainant.

7.                Copy of this order be supplied to both the parties free of costs. File be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

Announced in open court:

04.10.2023.

                                                          ........................................................

                                                          Nagender Singh Kadian, President

                                                          ..........................................

                                                          Tripti Pannu, Member.

                                                          ……………………………….

                                                          Vijender Singh, Member