NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/4013/2009

MAHARASTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION CO.LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

SHRI.SANJAY JAYKRUSHNA LOVE - Opp.Party(s)

M/S. M.V.KINI

18 Nov 2009

ORDER

Date of Filing: 30 Oct 2009

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/4013/2009
(Against the Order dated 24/04/2008 in Appeal No. 859/2007 of the State Commission Maharastra)
1. MAHARASTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION CO.LTD.Urban Division-2. Jalgaon Dist Jalgaon Through Assisatant Engineer Urban Division . Jalgaon ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. SHRI.SANJAY JAYKRUSHNA LOVER/o. 2B. Gangopi Apartment Jalgaon. Tq. & Distt. Jalgaon ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN ,PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. B.K. TAIMNI ,MEMBER
For the Appellant :Mr.Amit Kumar, Advocate for M/S. M.V.KINI, Advocate
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 18 Nov 2009
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

REVISION PETITION NO.          4013         OF       2009
(from the order dated 24.4.08 in Appeal No.859/07 of the State Commission, Maharashtra)
 
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd.                     … Petitioner
Versus
Sanjay Jaykrushna Love                                                               … Respondent
 
 
REVISION PETITION NO.          4014         OF       2009
(from the order dated 24.4.08 in Appeal No.860/07 of the State Commission, Maharashtra)
 
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd.                     … Petitioner
Versus
Prakash Baburao Borse                                                             … Respondent
 
 
 
ORDER
 
            This order shall dispose of Revision Petitions No.4013 & 4014/2009 as the facts and the law point involved is the same.
            Application for condonation of delay has been filed to condone the delay of 424 days in filing the Revision Petition, which is over and above the period of 90 days statutorily given to file the Revision Petition. Under the Consumer Protection Act, the consumer fora are required to decide the case within a period of 90 days from the date of filing, in case, no evidence is required to be taken and within 150 days, wherever evidence is required to be taken. Delay of 424 days cannot be condoned without sufficient cause being shown. In the application for condonation of delay, it has been stated that the petitioner received the order passed by the State Commission after about a month and thereafter the file was moving from table to table to get the permission to file the Revision Petition. 

We are not satisfied with the cause shown. Application for condonation of delay is dismissed.   Consequently, the Revision Petition is dismissed as barred by limitation.



......................JASHOK BHANPRESIDENT
......................B.K. TAIMNIMEMBER