NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/3050/2010

ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED - Complainant(s)

Versus

SHRI. MOHAN CHAND CHAUHAN - Opp.Party(s)

MR. MANISH PRATAP SINGH

17 Sep 2010

ORDER


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 3050 OF 2010
(Against the Order dated 23/12/2009 in Appeal No. 365/2008 of the State Commission Himachal Pradesh)
1. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDThrough its Manager, KaithuShimla - 171003Himachal Pradesh ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. SHRI. MOHAN CHAND CHAUHANR/o. Village Manjholi, Tehsil KotkhaiShimlaHimachal Pradesh ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN ,PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. VINEETA RAI ,MEMBER
For the Petitioner :MR. MANISH PRATAP SINGH
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 17 Sep 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

This revision petition has been filed with a delay of 148 days, which is over and above the statutory period of 90 days given for filing the revision petitioner.  Consumer fora are required to decide the cases in a summary manner within given time frame.  Complaint has to be disposed of within 90 days from the date of filing where no evidence is required to be taken and within 150 days where evidence

-2-

is required to be taken.  The inordinate delay of 148 days cannot be condoned without sufficient cause being shown.  The only cause shown for the delay is that the file was moving from table to table to get the permission to file the revision petition.  The delay of each day has to be explained which the petitioner has failed to do.  We are not satisfied with the cause shown for condonation of delay.  Application seeking condonation of delay is dismissed.  Consequently, revision petition is dismissed as barred by time.



......................JASHOK BHANPRESIDENT
......................VINEETA RAIMEMBER