Assam

StateCommission

MA/18/2019

Kalaincherra Tea Estate - Complainant(s)

Versus

Shri Subharangshu Deb - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. A.S. Dhillon

06 Feb 2020

ORDER

BEFORE THE ASSAM STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
GUWAHATI
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/18/2019
( Date of Filing : 21 Feb 2019 )
In
First Appeal No. A/9/2019
 
1. Kalaincherra Tea Estate
Represented b its anager PO Kalain-788812, District Cachar, Assam
Cachar
Assam
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Shri Subharangshu Deb
Son of late Ishita Rajan Das R O Kalaincherra TE, PO Kalain, District Cachar, Assam The Additional Provident Fund Commissioner, Board of Trustee, The Assam Tea Plantation Provident Fund and Pension Fund and DLI Scheme, Nidhi Bhawan, Asistha, Lalmati, NH 37, Guwahati 29, Assam
2. The Additional Provident Fund Commissioner
Board of Trustee, The Assam Tea Plantation Provident Fund and Pension Fund and DLI Scheme, Nidhi Bhawan, Asistha, Lalmati, NH 37, Guwahati 29, Assam
3. The Assistant Provident Fund
The Assam Tea Plantation Provident Fund and Pension Fund and DLI Scheme, Trunk Road, Silchar, Cachar, Assam
4. The Fund Control Officer
The Assam Tea Plantation Provident Fund and Pension Fund & DLI Scheme P.O. & District Karimganj, Assam
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE Dr. Indira Shah PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Dilip Kr. Mahanta MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:Mr. S. P. Choudhury,Advocate, Proxy for Mr. A.S. Dhillon, Advocate for
For the Respondent: Mr. R. Dev,Advocate, for Ms. B. Bora, Advocate
 Ms. M. Devi, Advocate
 Ms. M. Devi, Advocate
 Ms. M. Devi, Advocate
Dated : 06 Feb 2020
Final Order / Judgement

          Heard Mr. S.P. Choudhury, learned counsel, appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. R. Dev, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent No. 1 and Ms. M. Devi, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent Nos. 2,3 and 4.

          This is an application for condoning the delay of 262 days in preferring the accompanying appeal. We have perused the statements made in the application. Also perused the objection filed on behalf of respondent No. 1. The grounds for delay has been explained in the application for condonation of delay. Thus, considering the statements made in the application, also for the ends of justice, delay in preferring the accompanying appeal is condoned subject to payment a cost of Rs. 1000/- to be paid to the respondents by the applicant.

          Misc Case is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE Dr. Indira Shah]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Dilip Kr. Mahanta]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.