Maharashtra

StateCommission

A/09/224

SHRI ANANTA BICHANNA PASALLU @ MISTRI - Complainant(s)

Versus

SHRI SANDEEP PRABHAKAR MEHER - Opp.Party(s)

B T NAVALE

05 Aug 2010

ORDER

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL
COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
 
First Appeal No. A/09/224
(Arisen out of Order Dated 13/01/2009 in Case No. 22/08 of District Raigarh)
 
1. SHRI ANANTA BICHANNA PASALLU @ MISTRI
AT RASANAM TAL TANDUR DIST RANGAREDDY ANDHRA PRADESH
Maharastra
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SHRI SANDEEP PRABHAKAR MEHER
GANGA COMPLEX NR SAMRTHA TAILORS M G ROAD PANVEL 410206
RAIGAF
Maharastra
2. 2. DILIP VASANTRAO CHAVAN, PRO. SAIPREM CONSTRUCTIONS
GREEN VIEW BLDG., C-WING, FLAT NO.1,NARAYAN NAGAR, BEHIND MUMBRA POLICE STATION, MUMBRA
THANE
3. 3. PARSHURAM NATHURAM BIDAVI (DEAD)
PARSHURAM APARTMENT BAGVAN MOHALLA, MIRCHI GALLI, PANVEL-06
RAIGAD
4. 3(1) MALATI PARSHURAM BIDAVI
PARSHURAM APARTMENT BAGVAN MOHALLA, MIRCHI GALLI, PANVEL-06
RAIGAD
5. 3(2) VIJAY PARSHURAM BIDAVI
PARSHURAM APARTMENT BAGVAN MOHALLA, MIRCHI GALLI, PANVEL-06
RAIGAD
6. 3-2(1) UJJAWAL VIJAY BIDAVI
PARSHURAM APARTMENT BAGVAN MOHALLA, MIRCHI GALLI, PANVEL-06
RAIGAD
7. 3(3) SUNIL PARSHURAM BIDAVI
PARSHURAM APARTMENT BAGVAN MOHALLA, MIRCHI GALLI, PANVEL-06
RAIGAD
8. 3-3(1) RANJANA SUNIL BIDAVI
PARSHURAM APARTMENT BAGVAN MOHALLA, MIRCHI GALLI, PANVEL-06
RAIGAD
9. 3(4) PRAKASH PARSHURAM BIDAVI
PARSHURAM APARTMENT BAGVAN MOHALLA, MIRCHI GALLI, PANVEL-06
RAIGAD
10. 3(5) SURESH PARSHURAM BIDAVI
PARSHURAM APARTMENT BAGVAN MOHALLA, MIRCHI GALLI, PANVEL-06
RAIGAD
11. 3(6) ANIL PARSHURAM BIDAVI
PARSHURAM APARTMENT BAGVAN MOHALLA, MIRCHI GALLI, PANVEL-06
12. 3(7) SUBHAS PARSHURAM BIDAVI
PARSHURAM APARTMENT BAGVAN MOHALLA, MIRCHI GALLI, PANVEL-06
RAIGAD
13. 3(8) ASHA PARSHURAM BIDAVI
PARSHURAM APARTMENT BAGVAN MOHALLA, MIRCHI GALLI, PANVEL-06
RAIGAD
14. 3(8) ASHA PARSHURAM BIDAVI
PARSHURAM APARTMENT BAGVAN MOHALLA, MIRCHI GALLI, PANVEL-06
RAIGAD
15. 3(9) NISHA PARSHURAM BIDAVI
PARSHURAM APARTMENT BAGVAN MOHALLA, MIRCHI GALLI, PANVEL-06
RAIGAD
16. 3(10) USHA PARSHURAM BIDAVI
PARSHURAM APARTMENT BAGVAN MOHALLA, MIRCHI GALLI, PANVEL-06
RAIGAD
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 Hon'ble Mr.Justice S.B.Mhase PRESIDENT
 Hon'ble Mr. S.R. Khanzode Judicial Member
 Hon'ble Mr. Dhanraj Khamatkar Member
 
PRESENT:
 Shri Prakash Bidvai one of the respondents.
ORDER

Per Justice Shri S.B.Mhase, Hon’ble President:

 

 

 

 

This appeal is directed as against the order passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raigad in consumer complaint no. 22/2008 decided on 13/01/2009.  By the said order the complaint filed by the appellant has been dismissed. Therefore, org. complainants  has filed the this appeal.  In this appeal the org.opponents are the respondents.

          This appeal has been filed by the complainant through Advocates

Shri B.T.Navale, Rachana K. Bhate and Priya S.Parange.  Thus, the complainant has engaged three advocates.  The appeal has been filed on 24/02/2009.  It was listed for admission on 27/08/2009.  On 27/08/2009 when the appeal was called, no one was present for the appellant that means all the three advocates and appellants were absent.  It appears that after filing of the appeal Adv.Navale has sent notice to the respondents informing the date that the appeal is coming before State Commission on 27/08/2009.  By the said notice only copy of the appeal memo has been served but rest of the compilation was not served on the respondent.  The respondent – Prakash Bidavi appeared on that day and he waived the notice.  Thereafter, the appeal appeared on 18/01/2010.  On 18/01/2010 also no one  was present for the appellant.  However, the respondent was present.  He was directed to file power of attorney for the rest of the respondents and it was adjourned to 10/06/2010.  On 10/06/2010 the Commission was busy in old matters and therefore, it was adjourned to 05/08/2010 i.e. today.  Today all the three advocates for the appellant are absent.  Respondent/ Prakash Bidwi is present. 

Under these circumstances, we find that appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal.  The appellants and their advocate are continuously absent as stated above.  Hence, we pass the following order:-

 

                            

                                      :-ORDER-:

 

1.                 Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

2.                 No order as to costs.

3.                 Dictated on dais.

4.                 Copies of the order herein be furnished to the parties.

 

 
 
[Hon'ble Mr.Justice S.B.Mhase]
PRESIDENT
 
[Hon'ble Mr. S.R. Khanzode]
Judicial Member
 
[Hon'ble Mr. Dhanraj Khamatkar]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.