Haryana

StateCommission

A/1019/2023

M/S BPTP LTD - Complainant(s)

Versus

SHRI RAM NIWAS HOODA - Opp.Party(s)

HEMANT SINI

21 Feb 2024

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA

                                                         

                                                          Date of Institution:05.09.2023

                                                          Date of final hearing:21.02.2024

                                                          Date of Pronouncement: 21.02.2024

 

 

FIRST APPEAL No.1019 OF 2023

 

IN THE MATTER OF

 

M/s BPTP Ltd. through its Authorized Representative Registered Office at: 28, ECE House, K.G. Marg, New Delhi-110001.

 

                                      ….Appellant

Versus

 

 

Shri Ram Niwas Hooda resident of House No.1, Chanakya Puri, Behind Sheela Cinema, Rohtak, Haryana-124000.

                                                                             …Respondent

 

 

         

CORAM:   Hon’ble Mr. Justice T.P.S. Mann, President

                  

 

Present:     Ms. Neha, proxy counsel for Shri Hemant Saini, counsel for the appellant.

 

 

 

 

PER: T.P.S. MANN, J.

 

ORDER

 

 

1. The present appeal has been preferred by M/s BPTP Ltd. for challenging the order dated 11.07.2023 passed by the District Consumer Commission Disputes Redressal Commission, Rohtak whereby complaint preferred by the complainants Ram Niwas Hooda, Azad Singh Malik and Ajit Singh was allowed and the opposite party was directed to hand over the possession of flat/floor to the complainants within one month and also to pay interest @9% p.a. upon the amount deposited by the complainants with the opposite party from the date of settlement deed dated 11.08.2022 till handing over the actual physical possession to the complainants. The opposite party was also directed to hand over the relevant documents required for sale i.e. to issued permission to transfer letter and other required documents for sale to the complainants within a week from the date of order. The opposite party was also directed to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- as compensation and Rs.5,000/- as litigation expenses to the complainants.
2. On the previous date, notice of the appeal was issued to the respondent through registered post.
3. Proxy counsel appearing for the appellant states that during the pendency of the present appeal, parties have amicably settled the matter and accordingly, the appellant wishes to withdraw the appeal.
4. In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of as having been withdrawn.
5. Application(s) pending, if any, stand disposed of in terms of the aforesaid order.
6. A copy of this order be provided to all the parties free of cost as mandated by the law. The order be uploaded forthwith on the website of the Commission for the perusal of the parties.
7. Statutory amount of Rs.4,09,435/- (Rs. Four Lakh Nine Thousand Four Hundred Thirty Five only) deposited by the opposite party at the time of filing of present appeal be refunded to the appellant against proper receipt, identification and as per rules.
8. File be consigned to record room along with a copy of this order.

 

 

(T.P.S. MANN)

PRESIDENT

 

 

Pronounced On: 21.02.2024

MS