Per Shri S.R. Khanzode, Hon’ble Presiding Judicial Member

          Perused the impugned order.

          This is an execution proceeding under Section 27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.  Based upon the report of the Commissioner, it was alleged by the opponent/accused that the execution proceeding be dropped since the order in the consumer complaint, as modified in the appeal, has been complied with.  Executant takes an exception to the contention stating that the order passed in the consumer complaint as modified in the appeal has not been complied with and therefore, insisted upon for taking further proceeding in his execution application under Section 27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).  Considering this controversy, Forum below as per the impugned order opined that it would proceed further with the execution proceeding.  We find no fault with the Forum below for the course, which it adopted.  In fact these directions are not a matter of Revision, whereby, which reflects that the Forum below has decided to take cognizance of the offence under Section 27 of the Act.  Thus, finding the Revision Petition devoid of any substance, we pass the following order :-

                             -: ORDER :-

1.       Revision Petition is dismissed in limine.

2.       No order as to costs.

3.       Copies of the order be furnished to the parties.