Maharashtra

StateCommission

MA/10/221

NASHTE TELE SYSTEM RELIANCE (N V SYSTEM) - Complainant(s)

Versus

SHRI DEEPAK RANMALE - Opp.Party(s)

A BHUMKAR

06 Aug 2010

ORDER


BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL

COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/10/221
1. NASHTE TELE SYSTEM RELIANCE (N V SYSTEM)DASRA CHOUK KOLHAPUR Maharastra ...........Appellant(s)

Versus
1. SHRI DEEPAK RANMALE SHIVAJI NAGAR TAL HATKANANGLE KOLHAPUR Maharastra ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE :
Hon'ble Mr. P.N. Kashalkar PRESIDING MEMBERHon'ble Mrs. S.P.Lale Member
PRESENT :Mr.Umesh Mangave,Advocate, Proxy for A BHUMKAR , Advocate for for the Appellant 1 Mr.S.M. Mangaonkar, Advocate for the Respondent 1

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Counsel for the applicant/appellant has produced entire hospital record to show that Advocate Mr.B.R. Patil was taken treatment from 09/01/2009 to 09/03/2010.  There is delay of three months and 14 days in filing appeal.  Condonation of delay application has been file to seek condonation of delay.  Application is supported by the affidavit.  Relying on the affidavit and respondent’s Counsel having no objection, we are inclined to allow this application to condone the delay subject to certain costs.  Hence, we pass the following order :-

                       -: ORDER :-

1.  Application is allowed.  Delay is condoned subject to cost of Rs.1,000/- payable to the respondent.

PRONOUNCED :
Dated : 06 August 2010

[Hon'ble Mr. P.N. Kashalkar]PRESIDING MEMBER[Hon'ble Mrs. S.P.Lale]Member