Per-Hon’ble Sou.Usah S. Thakare, Presiding Judicial Member

(1)     Adv.Nikhil Mehta is present for the appellant.  None is present for the respondent.  The appellant has not complied with the order passed on the delay condonation application.  Appellant failed to make payment of costs as per the direction.  Adv.Mehta for the appellant requested for an adjournment for compliance of the order.   He also urged that he has sent an e-mail dated 19/10/2012 to the appellant.  In spite of receipt of the e-mail, the appellant or even no one on behalf of the appellant has taken pain to remain present before this Commission.  It is not desirable to prolong the matter, when the appellant is not complying with the order of this Commission.  We, therefore, dispose of the appeal for non-prosecution. 

Pronounced on 19^th August, 2013.