District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh

CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 242  OF  2017

BEFORE:

          S.S.PANESAR, PRESIDENT

          SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER

          SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBER

PRESENT:

Sh.Rohit Verma, Counsel for Complainant.

Sh.Simranjeet Singh, Counsel for OP.

Dated : 22^nd March 2017

ORDER

     Heard. Complaint perused. Prima facie the complainant comes within definition of ‘Consumer’ and there exists consumer dispute inter se parties. So, complaint is admitted. Notice be sent to OP.

     At this stage, Sh.Simranjeet Singh, Advocate, put in appearance and accepts notice on behalf of OP by way of filing his vakalatnama. As counsel for OP has appeared, notice to OP need not be issued. Document regarding compromise dated 22.03.2017 (Annexure Z) has been filed.

     Counsel for complainant has made an endorsement on the first page of the complaint that in view of Annexure Z, he withdraws this complaint. Hence this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Parties shall be bound by the compromise dated 22.03.2017 Annexure Z.

     Certified copies of this order be sent to the parties free of cost. The file be consigned.