Having due regard to the scheme of the Act and purpose sought to be

achieved to protect the interest of the consumers, better the provisions are to

be interpreted broadly, positively and purposefully in the context of the

present case to give meaning to additional/extended jurisdiction, particularly

when Section 3 seeks to provide remedy under the Act in addition to other

remedies provided under other Acts unless there is clear bar.

10. ¾Ö¸üᯙ ×−Ö¾ÖÖ›uμOOŸs»Ö ŸŸÖ ¯ÖÖÆüŸÖ ŸÎúÖ¸ü¤üÖ¸ü μOOO“Öß ŸÎúÖ¸ü μOO ´ÖÓ“ÖŸ “Ö»Ö×¾Ö+μOOAO úÖÆüßÆüß ²ÖÖ¬ÖÖ

μOeŸ −ÖÆüß μOO ´ÖŸÖÃÖ †´Æüß †»ÖÖê †ÆüÖêŸ. ´Æü+Öæ− ´Öã§üÖ Îú.2 “ê ˆÖ¸ü †´Æüß ÆüÖêúÖ¸üÖ£Öá ¤êüŸ †ÆüÖêŸ.

11.

¯ÖÖÆüŸÖ ŸμOOO−ß ²ÖэêúŸ ¸üú´ÖÖ ÷Öãӟ׾ֻμOO AuOeŸμOO Æüß ²ÖÖ²Ö ×ÃÖ¬¤ü ÆüÖêŸê. ŸÎúÖ¸ü¤üÖ¸ü μOOO−ß ×¾Ö¹ý¬¤ü ¯ÖÖ μOOO“μOOú›ü

5

ŸÖÎúÖ¸ü Îú.201/2010

¾ÖÖ¸Óü¾ÖÖ¸ü ¸üú´Öê“Öß ´ÖÖ÷Ö+Öß ú¹ý−ÖÃÖ㬤üÖ ²Öэêú−Öê ŸÖÎúÖ¸ü¤üÖ¸ü μOOO−Ö ¸üú´ÖÖ †üÖ êú»μOO −ÖÆüߟ. ¾ÖÖß׾֍ú

šü¾ÖߤüÖ¸üÖÓ−Ö ¾Öêôêû¾Ö¸ü ¸üOEú´Ö ¯Ö¸üŸ ú¸ü+Öê ²Öэêú“ê úŸÔ¾μO ÆüÖêŸê. ¯Ö¸ÓüŸæ ´ÖÖ÷Ö+Öß ú¹ý−Æüß ¸üOEú´Ö − ¤êü+Öê Æüß

×¾Ö¹ý¬¤ü ¯ÖÖ μOOO“Öß ŸÎúÖ¸ü¤üÖ¸ü μOOO−Ö ªÖ¾OμOO“μOO ÃÖê¾ÖêŸß»Ö Ÿé™ß †Æêü †Öê μOO ´ÖÓ“Ö“ê ´ÖŸ †Æêü. ´Æü+Öæ− ´Öã§üÖ

Îú.3 “ê ˆÖ¸ü †´Æüß ÆüÖêúÖ¸üÖ£Öá ¤êüŸ †ÆüÖêŸ.

12.

.3 ते 18 संचालक यांना आदेश )ावा अशी -वनंती केली आहे. -व द प" तफ- अड.

यांनी सदर बँकेवर /द.30/03/07 रोजी 5शासक व /द.21/02/2009 पासून अवसायक ाची

िनयु ती क र यात आलेली आहे. 9 यामुळे बँकेचा संपुण; < यवहार अवसायक यां= या ता> यात

आहे ? हणून 9 यांना वै तीशः र क म दे यास जबाबदार ठर-वता येणार नाहB असा यु तीवाद

केला.

13.

आयोग , पLरमा खंड-पठ, औरंग ाबाद यांनी

Purushottam Kalu Patil

M.A.No.07/2009

9 याम ये मा.राH य आयोग यांनी पुढBल 5माणे मत < य त केले आहे.

Learned counsel for the appellant brought to our notice that

Liquidator is appointed on respondent bank vide order No.URB/D-

4/P.K.Anna P.Bank/Liquidation/2009/111 dated 3

Liquidator`s name is Shri.Sopan Shinde, Dist.Dy. Registrar,Cooperative

Societies, Nandurbar,Dist.Nandurbar, who is to conduct the affairs of the

said bank as per the powers exercisable U/s1 05 of Maharashtra

Cooperative Act 1960. Appointment is U/s 110-A(ii) of Maharashtra

Co.operative Societies Act, 1960. Learned counsel for the appellant brought

to our notice the judgment of National Commission in Revision Petition

2528/2006 & others in case Reserve Bank of India –Vs- Eshwarappa & Anr.

reported in 1 (2008) CPJ 30(NC). Hon`ble National Commission observed

that;

“Considering the aforesaid situation, there is no alternative but to

direct the Liquidator to abide by the final order passed by the Consumer

Fora, namely, the District Forum or the State Commission and to make

6

ŸÖÎúÖ¸ü Îú.201/2010

payment of the amount which is crystallised by the said Fora, within a

period of six weeks from today”.

5.

Dist.Dy.Registrar has been appointed as Liquidator of Shri.P.K.Anna Patil

Sahakari Bank to conduct affairs of the bank. As per ratio in Eshwarappa`s

case when the Liquidator is appointed against sick institution, the

Liquidator is whole and sole controlling agent of the property of the said

Sanstha. It is for him to disburse the liability of the loan or any of the

liability etc. against the receipt realized from the property of the said

Sanstha. It also be mentioned that non-bailable warrant had been issued

against appellant No.2. In view of ratio in Eshwarappa`s case(Supra) order

issuing warrant against appellant Purushottam Patil is hereby quashed and

set aside. Order dated 05.02.2009 passed by District Forum is hereby

quashed and set aside and respondent No.1 is directed to approach

Liquidator for the satisfaction of the liability from the assets of the bank.

तसेच मा

र-वंZ ंईसाइ -व द राज\ी राजकु मार चौधरB या Vय ाियक ]E टांताम य े पढु Bल 5माणे मत <य त के ले

आहे