Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/124/2012

SHIYAM THIRTH FLAT OWNERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION, PRESIDENT - Complainant(s)

Versus

SHIYAM FOUNDATION AND HOUSING PVT. LTD., MANAGING DIRECTOR - Opp.Party(s)

G. PALANI

25 Nov 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                         Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

C.C. No.124/2012

                         DATED THE 25^TH  DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021

 

 

M/s. Shiyam Thirth Flat Owners’

Welfare Association,

Registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies’ Act,
Registration No.439/2009,

Represented by its President,

No.1 D, 2^nd Main Road,

North Jaganatha Nagar,

Villivakkam,

Chennai – 600 049.                                                                                                                          .. Complainant.

 

-Versus-

1. M/s. Shiyam Foundation & Housing Private Limited,

Represented by its Managing Director

Mr. S. Sundararaman,

“Shiyam’s Anugreha”,

No.18-GF, Vadthiar Thottam Main Road,

Kodambakkam,

Chennai – 600 024.

 

2. M/s. IAEC Industries Madras Limited,

Represented by its Director

Mr. B.S. Adisesh,

No.10B, New No.14, VGM Street,

Nungambakkam,

Chennai – 600 034.                                                                                                                  .. Opposite Parties.

 

Counsel for the complainant            : M/s. G. Palani

Counsel for the opposite parties      : M/s. S. Ramesh

          This consumer complaint coming up before us on 25.11.2021 for appearance of both and for arguments (in list) and this Commission made the following order in open court:                                                      

Docket order

Opposite parties present.  No representation for complainant. Today, this matter is posted for appearance of both and for arguments (in list).   When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M., there was no representation for complainant.   Hence, the matter was passed over and again called at 01.15 P.M. the complainant was again not present.  Since the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case, the complaint is dismissed for default.   No cost.

 

 

                    Sd/-                                                                                                             Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                                 R.SUBBIAH                        

          MEMBER                                                                                                   PRESIDENT